Compare Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Easily develop test automation
Our company automates a lot of functional tests for SAP. The automated tests are included in larger integration tests of SAP transaction, workflows... Read more »
Anonymous User
Helps to determine problem areas but it has many problems and limitations
It gives us the opportunity to serve banking clients while conforming to industry regulations.
Use Oracle Application Testing Suite? Share your opinion.
Free Report: Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
Download now
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ease of use is superior to anything on the market. It's very easy to integrate. We've been very impressed with the tool. Because we primarily use the configuration with SAP, the integration is pretty seamless. But we have used our own in-house VB app as well, and it's worked very well with that.""We love the Capture 2.0 feature. It seems to work very well.""The ability to work with the data, with recordsets, and plug those into the scripts is very easy and very powerful. We use it extensively.""It's script-free, which is really important for our end users because we are usually dealing with colleagues who are not developers and who do not always have the technical background of developing and scripting. It's very useful that there is a nice UI and the tool is script-free.""One big advantage of Worksoft Certify is its integration with SAP Solution Manager...""It is very user-friendly with an appealing UI, unlike a lot of other automation tools that we have evaluated. The fact that it can be used to across SAP and non-SAP applications (including web-based apps) is a big advantage. Using Certify Process Capture functionality has helped in hassle free test design creation, without the need to spend any extra effort to capture test steps and screenshots. The integration elements across HPE ALM and Solution Manager also work well.""If we write a new test that's 80 percent the same as an existing test, it is pretty straightforward to reuse the steps from existing tests for our new tests and build upon them.""It is very easy to maintain. With scripts, I can change one line and in one step. Whatever I want, I can do. I don't need to be an expert to use it."

More Worksoft Certify Pros »

"It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry.""One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly.""The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks.""The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.""The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.""The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.""The most valuable feature is stability."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pros »

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good.""We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.""The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros »

Cons
"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications.""The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on.""Our interactions with technical support has not been the best always and there is room for improvement especially with respect to the time taken to respond to cases. However, with the right contacts and reasonable escalations we have always managed to get quick attention on our cases.""One feature that we have been asking for has been to treat tests as code and store the source code for tests in a configuration management tool. Right now, for version control of testing, it's all internally within the tool. If we have a test of a business process and want to revive that test, our methodology now is purely manual work. We go into the tool, create a copy of the existing test, and call the next one: v2. Now, we have two of them and the only way you can tell them apart is by its naming convention.""I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool.""We are looking for some enhancements on the Capture 2.0 tool. This would give us the ability to control it directly, like we could with Capture 1.0. Right now, Capture 2.0 doesn't really work for our Business Analysts.""There was a change to Capture 2.0. In the end, there have been some challenges with the newer version. Therefore, the company testers, the local ones, do not want to use Capture 2.0.""When it is unstable, there will be times when a test that we are running in Certify will just stop, and it will say, "Aborted." There will be errors. There will be no explanation as to why it happens. It has now happened maybe one out of 20 times. When it happens, I just tell our QA team to stop Certify and restart it, hoping we don't see it again."

More Worksoft Certify Cons »

"It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.""The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.""It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute.""UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive.""The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years.""The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.""It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.""Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Cons »

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved.""The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.""It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment.""The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks.""Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost.""We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more.""We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future.""By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool.""Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

More Worksoft Certify Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.""The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.""The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution.""When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?
Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that… more »
Read all 31 answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?
Top Answer: The licensing is yearly.
Read all 13 answers
What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?
Top Answer: Looking at it as a product fully packaged, I would like to see more documentation or ease of use of the documentation… more »
Read all 31 answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is stability.
Read all 8 answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
Top Answer: This is a script-based tool and the usability needs to be improved. Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would… more »
Read all 8 answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
Top Answer: I primarily use this solution for the automation of regression testing in SAP.
Read all 8 answers
Is Oracle Application Testing Suite or Micro Focus UFT One better for automating Oracle Fusion Ap...
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF… more »
What do you like most about Oracle Application Testing Suite?
Top Answer: The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts.
Read all 3 answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Application Testing Suite?
Top Answer: There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs. Worksoft Certify
Compared 32% of the time.
Selenium HQ vs. Worksoft Certify
Compared 26% of the time.
Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify
Compared 2% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
+ Add more products to compare
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFTOATS
Learn
Worksoft
Micro Focus
Oracle
Overview
Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
Offer
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn More
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer
Learn More
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Learn More
Sample Customers
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest AirlinesWalmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United AirlinesComic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company28%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider16%
Healthcare Company11%
Computer Software Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider13%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise82%
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise79%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Large Enterprise98%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise50%
Free Report: Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
Download now
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 20th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 6.8, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Helps to determine problem areas but it has many problems and limitations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Doesn't require a separate management tool but it is lacking support ". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, Silk Test and Katalon Studio, whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Katalon Studio and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.