We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. ReadyAPI

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. ReadyAPI and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.""The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.""The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The cost is the most important factor in this tool.""The most valuable features are the object repository.""This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us.""The solution is very scalable."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pros »

"The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly.""It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools.""A single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.""When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing.""It's easy to learn how to use it."

More ReadyAPI Pros »

Cons
"The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years.""The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.""It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.""Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful.""In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.""In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure.""With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine.""The pricing could be improved."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Cons »

"Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data.""The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.""Lacking flexibility of adding more custom verification for security testing.""The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved.""It doesn't have connectors to the NoSQL database. This is one of the things where they do not have a very solid strategy today. Other solutions have an in-built mechanism where I can directly and easily connect. An API is more around a user submitting a request on the frontend. It then hits the backend, puts the data, and responds back. If I am hitting MongoDB or NoSQL databases, I do not have ready-made inbuilt solutions in ReadyAPI that can easily help me in automating it faster. In our organization, we deal with NoSQL databases, and therefore, we need Groovy. We just cannot have a connector from ReadyAPI to do that. I have to write Groovy scripts. If you have themes that are predominantly using MongoDB, it leads to more maintenance and support activity because we are introducing more code into our commission. In terms of additional features, it can have cloud support. This is one of the things where we are getting into cloud support. We'll see how it works, but it is one of the doubts that we still have.""Version control does not work well."

More ReadyAPI Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.""The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution.""When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less.""It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items.""The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests.""Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost of a license is probably around $1,000 to $2,000. Accounting is done by my leadership. I am more into implementations and making sure all things and processes are taken care of and the frameworks are maintained and managed.""There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more."

More ReadyAPI Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Integrates well with other products.
Top Answer: The issue with all the integration is that it can become very costly and expensive and we'd like to be able to recommend one single tool that will do it all.
Top Answer: It's easy to learn how to use it.
Top Answer: Licensing costs are yearly. There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more.
Top Answer: Version control does not work well. It's has a git API which is defective and doesn't work well with our version repository, Bitbucket. We do all version control using git bash (command line driven)… more »
Ranking
9th
Views
5,179
Comparisons
3,687
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
624
Rating
7.1
11th
Views
6,550
Comparisons
4,659
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
542
Rating
7.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
Ready API
Learn More
Overview

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

ReadyAPI combines the power of SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, ServiceV, and API Monitoring in AlertSite into a single pane of glass. From functional testing, to performance testing to post-deployment monitoring, SmartBear’s API tools help you to deliver accurate, fast, and secure APIs.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer
Learn more about ReadyAPI
Sample Customers
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Healthcare Data Solutions (HDS)
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider14%
Computer Software Company9%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company10%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise88%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise89%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. ReadyAPI and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews while ReadyAPI is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 7.0, while ReadyAPI is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes " A great single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Visual Studio Test Professional and Sauce Labs, whereas ReadyAPI is most compared with SoapUI Pro, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Sauce Labs. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. ReadyAPI report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.