Compare Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks.""The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.""The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.""The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The cost is the most important factor in this tool.""The most valuable features are the object repository.""This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pros »

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others.""The interface is user-friendly.""The solution offers excellent integration capabilities.""It's a very simple solution to use.""The solution scales well.""It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly.""The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

More SoapUI Pro Pros »

Cons
"UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive.""The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years.""The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.""It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.""Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful.""In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.""In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure.""With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Cons »

"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs.""The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user.""Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better.""If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating.""Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang.""There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users.""It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there."

More SoapUI Pro Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.""The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution.""When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less.""It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items.""The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests.""Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost is not that bad.""I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay.""My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years.""The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees.""We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

More SoapUI Pro Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Integrates well with other products.
Top Answer: The issue with all the integration is that it can become very costly and expensive and we'd like to be able to recommend one single tool that will do it all.
Top Answer: The solution scales well.
Top Answer: The solution does have a free and licensed version. We use both versions. The licensed version, however, does have more features and options. We have 15 licenses right now and will likely increase… more »
Top Answer: It is helpful for individuals, however for a big team, for example, if I change any code in my project, for my colleague, it's difficult for them to use the same. This is the drawback. It's not ideal… more »
Ranking
9th
Views
5,095
Comparisons
3,610
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
646
Rating
7.1
10th
Views
7,897
Comparisons
6,558
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
451
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
SoapUI NG Pro
Learn More
Overview

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer
Learn more about SoapUI Pro
Sample Customers
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider14%
Computer Software Company9%
Retailer9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider9%
Insurance Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm23%
Logistics Company15%
Consumer Goods Company8%
Leisure / Travel Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise88%
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise65%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 12 reviews while SoapUI Pro is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 7.0, while SoapUI Pro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "Has out-of-the-box database support and can be easily used by non-technical staff ". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Visual Studio Test Professional and Silk Test, whereas SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Postman, Parasoft SOAtest, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.