Compare Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
Sponsored | ||
 |
Most Helpful Review | ||||
| Use Visual Studio Test Professional? Share your opinion. | |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2021. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance." "It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment." "The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks." "Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost." "We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more." "We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future." "By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool." "Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify." | "It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months." "The pricing is quite high compared to the competition." "The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution." "When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less." | "For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person." "I think that the pricing is quite good." "The pricing is expensive." More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice » |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Questions from the Community | ||
Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that… more » Top Answer: The licensing is yearly. Top Answer: Looking at it as a product fully packaged, I would like to see more documentation or ease of use of the documentation… more » | Top Answer: The most valuable feature is stability. Top Answer: The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another one. Top Answer: This is a script-based tool and the usability needs to be improved. Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would… more » | Top Answer: The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.
Top Answer: I think that the pricing is quite good. Top Answer: The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable. The diagrammatic… more » |
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 32% of the time.  Compared 26% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. Compared 3% of the time. | Compared 62% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time.  Compared 1% of the time. |  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT | ||
Learn | ||
| Worksoft | Micro Focus | Microsoft |
Overview  | ||
| Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com. | Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems. | Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Worksoft Certify | Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer | Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional |
Sample Customers | ||
| Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines | Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines | Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa |
Top Industries | ||
Manufacturing Company28% Energy/Utilities Company13% Consumer Goods Company13% Pharma/Biotech Company8% Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider12% Manufacturing Company7% Financial Services Firm7% | Financial Services Firm16% Comms Service Provider16% Healthcare Company11% Computer Software Company11% Computer Software Company41% Financial Services Firm12% Comms Service Provider12% Insurance Company7% | Computer Software Company38% Manufacturing Company25% Transportation Company13% Healthcare Company13% Computer Software Company37% Comms Service Provider19% Financial Services Firm7% Insurance Company6% |
Company Size | ||
Small Business6% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise85% Small Business9% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise82% | Small Business3% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise79% Small Business2% Large Enterprise98% | Small Business14% Midsize Enterprise14% Large Enterprise71% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 6.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Helps to determine problem areas but it has many problems and limitations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, Oracle Application Testing Suite and Katalon Studio, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Katalon Studio and Telerik Test Studio. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.