Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
Sponsored
 | Manjunath-Rao SAP Manager at a logistics company |
 | Vishwa-Reddy Test Automation Eng Senior Analyst at a tech services company |
 | Pieter De Jager Enterprise Architect at a tech services company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."
"Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."
"I think they came out with a different type of licensing specifically for testing. Therefore, you don't have to use a more expensive user license, you can use an automation license. So potentially, if we had 100 use cases, we could spin up a 100 different machines, have them all run and be done in five minutes. That would be the goal, but I don't know if that would actually succeed or not."
"This solution has enabled us to automate in order to tremendously save time. Only first time when you are recording and creating the script will you spend some time with it, the rest of the time, you are just executing."
"If we do one manual process, it could take approximately two hours. The same process using Worksoft probably takes ten minutes."
"We have seen ROI by being able to free up and give time back to the business for other value-added work."
"On our last big SAP implementation project, we inserted an automation resource into the beginning of the project. Between automating regression processes, data staging, and using our automation to help repair cutover and conversion issues. We saved the project about $1,700,000."
"Worksoft has paid for itself fives times over."
"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."
"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: You can drop a note to support@worksoft.com Their contact details are mentioned at https://www.worksoft.com/contact
Top Answer: Glad to see your post!!
In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so… more »
Top Answer: Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance… more »
Top Answer: Hi Subhash.
Both tools can:
UFT One - allows you to automate functional and regression testing for the widest range… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Panaya Test Center
Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Micro Focus UFT One simplifies end-to-end functional testing using intelligent test automation and embedded AI-based capabilities to accelerate testing across web, mobile, desktop, mainframe, API, and composite and packaged enterprise-grade apps.
QA and Testing teams can efficiently scale tests across distributed infrastructures and in parallel on web and mobile; script once and replay all tests with cross-browser support; and leverage a broad ecosystem of integrations from version control to continuous integration to agile and DevOps.
With support of 200+ technologies including SAP, Salesforce, Java, Citrix and more, UFT One increases test coverage from the UI to the API—and everything in between—for true multi-platform application testing.
Micro Focus UFT One is also known as Unified Functional Testing, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP).
With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil
Manufacturing Company28%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Logistics Company8%
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company16%
Healthcare Company16%
Computer Software Company13%
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise77%
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise94%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 12 reviews while Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.0, while Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "Testers have been able to free up their time: instead of doing mundane, repetitive tasks, they shift them off to automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Micro Focus UFT Developer, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Silk Test and Eggplant Functional, whereas Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ and Oracle Application Testing Suite.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.