We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications."
"The inside object repository is nice. We can use that and learn it through the ALM connection. That's a good feature. The reporting and smart identification features are also excellent."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."
"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."
"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."
"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."
"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."
"It's simple to set up."
"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."
"I would want to see a significant improvement in the tool's features. The most significant enhancements are support for panel execution and integration with DevSecOps."
"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."
"The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script."
"The product doesn't provide free training for the basic features."
"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."
"They should include AI-based testing features."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Selenium HQ.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
