Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus UFT One Logo
24,236 views|15,640 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
5,433 views|3,641 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols.""The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain.""UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pros »

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.""The statistics that are available are very good.""The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.""The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.""The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

More Silk Test Pros »

"Technical support could be improved.""The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients.""One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement.""It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

More Micro Focus UFT One Cons »

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.""Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are.""The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies.""The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.""They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

More Silk Test Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is quite costly and there is no free trial available."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If you are looking for advanced use cases for integrating JIRA with other systems, I suggest you look at products like Their platform is rich, flexible, and support common use… more »
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more »
Top Answer: UFT has improved our ability to regression test.
Top Answer: The statistics that are available are very good.
Top Answer: While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes… more »
Top Answer: I primarily use the solution for performance testing. It can also handle capacity planning on web applications. Silk Test is a tool with which we can simulate the number of users, and with that, ramp… more »
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Popular Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Micro Focus
Micro Focus

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm31%
Healthcare Company15%
Insurance Company15%
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider9%
Insurance Company5%
Computer Software Company50%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company6%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise67%
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise96%
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews while Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.2, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca and Katalon Studio. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.