Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test

Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Silk Test is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.6, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT Developer, whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Selenium HQ. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus UFT One Logo
25,414 views|15,957 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
5,298 views|3,717 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
SrinivasPakala
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,717 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
UFT has improved our ability to regression test.

Read more »

The statistics that are available are very good.The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.

Read more »

Cons
It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.

Read more »

Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are.The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies.The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,717 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
25,414
Comparisons
15,957
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
973
Avg. Rating
8.5
17th
Views
5,298
Comparisons
3,717
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
626
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company46%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company11%
Transportation Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise89%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,717 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.