We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and SmartBear TestComplete Mobile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools."It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications."
"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."
"It offers a wide range of testing."
"It's simple to set up."
"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."
"The scalability of Micro Focus UFT One is good."
"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."
"The features I find most valuable is the automatic remapping of aliases, because it is really helpful."
"I like that it offers internal methods for supported controls. It is very easy to code the tests. Object Spy is also a good feature."
"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."
"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."
"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."
"The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script."
"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."
"Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected."
"Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory. On this note, if you are running UFT on a virtual server I would add more RAM memory than the minimum requirements especially when using multiple add-ins. HP is pretty good about coming out with new patches to fix known issues and it pays for the user to check for new patches and updates on a regular basis."
"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."
"It is very difficult to use the aliases on old software."
"The mapping is pretty complicated because there are a lot of controls that are the same and if you have a long name with the object mapping it is easy to get confused."
Earn 20 points
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Mobile App Testing Tools with 89 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is ranked 14th in Mobile App Testing Tools. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete Mobile writes "We are facing sometimes the situation when we have some issues with our automated tests". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is most compared with .
See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
