Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"UFT has improved our ability to regression test.""This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain.""The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols.""The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement.""The initial setup is relatively easy.""On a scale of one to ten, I would give Micro Focus UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis.""It helps in identifying defects earlier. With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It helps us to provide early feedback."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pros »

"The features I find most valuable is the automatic remapping of aliases, because it is really helpful.""I like that it offers internal methods for supported controls. It is very easy to code the tests. Object Spy is also a good feature."

More SmartBear TestComplete Mobile Pros »

Cons
"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.""One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement.""The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients.""Technical support could be improved.""We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes.""The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded.""They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user.""We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."

More Micro Focus UFT One Cons »

"It is very difficult to use the aliases on old software.""The mapping is pretty complicated because there are a lot of controls that are the same and if you have a long name with the object mapping it is easy to get confused."

More SmartBear TestComplete Mobile Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue.""The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it."""Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive.""The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Glad to see your post!! In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so How it is possible and how effective it is?
Top Answer: Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance improvements in executing scripts (VBScripts) in UFT 14.XX or UFT 15.XX compared to… more »
Top Answer: It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
Views
20,976
Comparisons
13,597
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
1,304
Rating
8.0
7th
Views
245
Comparisons
151
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn More
Overview

Micro Focus UFT One simplifies end-to-end functional testing using intelligent test automation and embedded AI-based capabilities to accelerate testing across web, mobile, desktop, mainframe, API, and composite and packaged enterprise-grade apps.

QA and Testing teams can efficiently scale tests across distributed infrastructures and in parallel on web and mobile; script once and replay all tests with cross-browser support; and leverage a broad ecosystem of integrations from version control to continuous integration to agile and DevOps.

With support of 200+ technologies including SAP, Salesforce, Java, Citrix and more, UFT One increases test coverage from the UI to the API—and everything in between—for true multi-platform application testing.

Micro Focus UFT One is also known as Unified Functional Testing, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP).

AUTOMATE UI TESTING FOR ANY IOS OR ANDROID APP

Use script-free record and replay or choose from six languages, including Python and JavaScript, to create test automation scripts. Record repeatable and consistent gestures across any mobile device. Get full device control when creating automated UI tests. There is no modify or jail-break the app.

Separate the UI object identification from the test logic to build stable, easy-to-maintain automated tests. Seamless integration available with build server, source control systems, and defect management tools allows you to run automated mobile UI tests around the clock.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete Mobile
Sample Customers
Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company16%
Healthcare Company16%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business1%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise90%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 2nd in Mobile App Testing Tools with 15 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is ranked 7th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.0, while SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "Testers have been able to free up their time: instead of doing mundane, repetitive tasks, they shift them off to automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete Mobile writes "We are facing sometimes the situation when we have some issues with our automated tests". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Micro Focus UFT Developer, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Silk Test and Katalon Studio, whereas SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is most compared with Experitest, Xamarin Test Cloud, AWS Device Farm and Kobiton Mobile Device Testing. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.