Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. TestProject

Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while TestProject is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.6, while TestProject is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "Codeless test creation has significantly reduced the time required for test script maintenance". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. TestProject report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus UFT One Logo
25,385 views|16,157 comparisons
TestProject Logo
207 views|142 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. TestProject and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
UFT has improved our ability to regression test.

Read more »

It has reduced the management of the coding for the scripts by 40-50%. It has significantly reduced test scripts maintenance.Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%.

Read more »

Cons
It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.

Read more »

In terms of improvement, it needs better integration with implementing an overall solution for test planning and test data management.TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
25,385
Comparisons
16,157
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
973
Avg. Rating
8.5
27th
Views
207
Comparisons
142
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
347
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Tricentis
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about TestProject
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Retailer13%
Insurance Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company48%
Comms Service Provider10%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Large Enterprise98%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. TestProject and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.