We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Original Software Qualify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, SeleniumHQ and others in Regression Testing Tools."I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well."
"One advantage of Micro Focus UFT is that it is more compatible with SAP, Desktop ECC SAP, than S/4HANA."
"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols."
"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."
"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."
"The stop automation is a great feature."
"It offers a wide range of testing."
"Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement."
"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients."
"Technical support could be improved."
"I would want to see a significant improvement in the tool's features. The most significant enhancements are support for panel execution and integration with DevSecOps."
"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."
"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Regression Testing Tools with 89 reviews while Original Software Qualify is ranked 35th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Original Software Qualify is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Original Software Qualify writes "Flexible, multifunctional, and stable testing software with good technical support". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas Original Software Qualify is most compared with .
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.