Moutaz ZreinPrincipal Consultant at innoconsultants inc
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It's relatively easy to create folders or workspaces."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site."
"The solution is scalable. You can do both horizontal and vertical scaling."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."
"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."
"The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"The level of stability is good."
"The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."
"The speed of opening files is too slow and should be increased."
"Many of our customers would like to see an OCR feature, so it would be very good to have this in a future release."
"The solution needs to be more collaborative. I believe they are just coming up with the themes for this right now."
"Technical support could be improved. They are not fast enough, especially when we'll go deeper in the product itself. More complex issues make it very tough to find someone that can help you."
"Sharepoint doesn't integrate well with Oracle, and we use a lot of Oracle products at our company. Therefore, it makes more sense for us to go to Oracle instead of continuing to use Sharepoint."
"The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it."
"The permission management features need improvement."
"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."
"I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications."
"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
Earn 20 points
An app that pulls information about your email contacts' interests, experience, etc. from their social media accounts.
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.
Micro Focus Vibe is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Intranet with 1 review while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 8th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 20 reviews. Micro Focus Vibe is rated 3.0, while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Vibe writes "The speed of opening files and folders is too slow and can be very frustrating". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". Micro Focus Vibe is most compared with SharePoint, Slack and Atlassian Confluence, whereas Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, HighQ, Datto Workplace, CTERA Drive and SAP Jam.
See our list of .
We monitor all Enterprise Intranet reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.