Compare Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.""This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.""The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.""People are very pleased with the implementation.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.""No issues with stability."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pros »

"The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.""There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server.""The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product.""For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pros »

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name.""The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise.""As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

More Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.""I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.""In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.""The implementation is a long process that should be improved.""They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.""It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Cons »

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.""Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test.""It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.""SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Cons »

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved.""I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now.""It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

More Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Educational pricing is available for this solution.""We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.""Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pricing and Cost Advice »

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It’s in INR. Our data is on four sites and these are in the development phase. Different locations require different… more »
Top Answer: It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for… more »
Top Answer: For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful.
Top Answer: The tool dashboards are not good and don't meet our customers' needs. Because of this we generally use open source tools… more »
Top Answer: Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it… more »
Top Answer: I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to… more »
Top Answer: I would rate it an eight out of ten. My advice to someone considering this solution is to do a proof of concept. Clearly… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScopeSteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
Learn
VMware
Micro Focus
Riverbed
Overview

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.

Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals, a software-based approach, offers full-stack visibility & insights into your apps both on and off the cloud. It continuously monitors with minimal overhead to give you end-to-end visibility and insights around-the-clock. With AppInternals you get: application performance insights that trace every transaction from user to back-end. Understand app dependencies, or expose and fix even the most hard-to-detect code, SQL, network or web services problems quickly, network & infrastructure diagnostics that continuously monitor your dynamic infrastructure. See their impact on your apps and vice versa. Resolve resource utilization and network-related errors before users are impacted and user experience & business insights that understand your users' satisfaction and trends in real-time. Identify your application's best and least used features, and quantify its financial impact on business results.

Offer
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Learn more about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope
Learn more about Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals
Sample Customers
Box, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, LyftVodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation BankNational Instruments, Allianz
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm12%
Retailer5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government6%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Healthcare Company14%
Government14%
Media Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise59%
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is ranked 26th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals is ranked 29th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is rated 6.8, while Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope writes "System resource monitoring that generates automated alerts and support tickets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals writes "Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update". Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor and SCOM, whereas Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals is most compared with AppDynamics, Aternity, Dynatrace, Splunk and Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse. See our Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs. Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.