We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."
"The Cube Solution is quite different when compared to the rest of the competition and has unique functionality for advanced analytics."
"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."
"This is a well-integrated solution and that integration empowers results."
"The initial setup is straightforward. You just need to follow the documentation."
"The thing I find most valuable is that scalability, space storage, and computing power is separate. When you scale up, it is live from one second to the next — constantly available as you scale — so there is no downtime or interruption of services."
"It has great flexibility whenever we are loading data and performs ELT (extract, load, transform) techniques instead of ETL."
"I like the idea that you can assign roles and responsibilities, limiting access to data."
"The most valuable feature is the snapshot database. In one second, you can just take a snapshot of the database for test purposes."
"The snapshot feature is good, the rollback feature is good and the interface is user-friendly."
"From a data warehouse perspective, it's an excellent all-round solution. It's very complete."
"The solution is very stable."
"The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps."
"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."
"The pricing model needs to be improved."
"Machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities need to be more friendly for beginning users."
"I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive."
"Releases of new products and functionality is never accompanied by associated documentation, training and resources that adequately explain the release."
"The solution could improve the user interface and add functionality to the system."
"Maybe there could be some more connectors to other systems, but this is what they are constantly developing anyway."
"They do have a native connector to connect with integration tools for loading data, but it would be much better to have the functionality built-in."
"If you go with one cloud provider, you can't switch."
"Availability is a problem."
"The user interface continues to be an issue, especially when we need to get data out of Snowflake. It's very easy to get data in, but it's not too easy to get it out or extract it."
"They don't have any SLAs in place. It would be better if they did."
"We would like to have an on-premises deployment option that has the same features, including scalability."
"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."
"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."
"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."
"The whole licensing system is based on credit points. You can also make a license agreement with the company so that you buy credit points and then you use them. What you do not use in one year can be carried over to the next year."
"You pay based on the data that you are storing in the data warehouse and there are no maintenance costs."
"It is not cheap."
"The pricing for Snowflake is competitive."
"On average, with the number of queries that we run, we pay approximately $200 USD per month."
"Pricing is approximately $US 50 per DB. Terabyte is around $US 50 per month."
"The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
"The price of Snowflake is quite reasonable."
Earn 20 points
Snowflake provides a data warehouse built for the cloud, delivering a solution capable of solving problems for which legacy, on-premises and cloud data platforms were not designed.
Microsoft Analytics Platform System is ranked 15th in Data Warehouse with 4 reviews while Snowflake is ranked 1st in Data Warehouse with 40 reviews. Microsoft Analytics Platform System is rated 6.2, while Snowflake is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Analytics Platform System writes "Has unique functionality for advanced analytics but could use enhancement in machine learning and AI features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snowflake writes "Fast, convenient and requires almost no administration". Microsoft Analytics Platform System is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Amazon Redshift, Oracle Exadata, Apache Hadoop and Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse, whereas Snowflake is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Amazon Redshift, Vertica, Firebolt and Teradata. See our Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. Snowflake report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.