Compare Microsoft ATA [EOL] vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Rapid7 InsightIDR? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity.""The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.""The stability of the solution is very good."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pros »

"The web interface is great — very useful and user-friendly.""If you were on other solutions, you would notice that they use agents from third-party, from open-source, from a native OS, or from other tools. Here, however, it is an agent from Rapid7 itself. This adds to the solution's overall capabilities."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Pros »

Cons
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate.""It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict.""There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Cons »

"The interface for doing investigation needs to be enhanced with minor improvements that would make it more useful.""Cloud risk assessment is one area where I think they need a lot of improvement."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.
Top Answer: The software is not as advanced as many competitors. It doesn't offer the level of granularity that other software might. It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations… more »
Top Answer: The solution is primarily used by my clients in order to combine security software.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Unranked
In User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
Views
8,214
Comparisons
4,762
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
619
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Microsoft Advanced Threat AnalyticsInsightIDR
Learn
Microsoft
Rapid7
Overview
Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.

Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft ATA [EOL]
Learn more about Rapid7 InsightIDR
Sample Customers
Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' AssociationLiberty Wines, Pioneer Telephone, Visier
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government11%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government5%
Retailer4%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise50%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft ATA [EOL] is ranked unranked in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews while Rapid7 InsightIDR is ranked 6th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews. Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Rapid7 InsightIDR is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Good integration, simple to maintain, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightIDR writes "Easy to use with a simple setup and good scalability". Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Varonis Datalert, Securonix UEBA, Exabeam and IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, whereas Rapid7 InsightIDR is most compared with Splunk, Darktrace, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and AT&T AlienVault USM.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.