• Home
  • Microsoft ATA [EOL] vs. Niara

Microsoft ATA [EOL] vs Niara comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo

Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Read 3 Microsoft ATA [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
HPE Aruba Networking Logo

Niara

59 views|45 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft ATA [EOL] and Niara based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions
Use Niara?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."

    • More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    34th
    out of 43 in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    Views
    59
    Comparisons
    45
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, MS ATA [EOL]
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    HPE Aruba Networking
    Overview
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
    Fortune 500 Financial Services Company
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) while Niara is ranked 34th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Niara is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". On the other hand, Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Niara is most compared with .

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.