We performed a comparison between Microsoft ATA [EOL] and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA."One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its dashboards."
"Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization."
"The most valuable feature is the site scanning, where we can provide a complete subnet and what it is we need to scan on those devices."
"The solution is automatically scheduled so it runs by itself."
"Has great reporting features."
"The main functionality of identifying item endpoints that weren't properly patched or had vulnerabilities is the solution's most valuable feature."
"It is stable and scalable."
"You can bring in and get online to do reports fairly quickly,"
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"One area I would like to improve in InsightVM is its integration with other solutions."
"Rapid7 could be easier to manage."
"I would like to see more integration."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"Their customer support should be improved, and the effectiveness of scans also needs to be improved."
"In order to be able to properly test the solution and make a decision, I would like to receive the test license code instantly and eliminate the wait time."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"It would be great to have a mobile application client. Currently, you have to use a mobile web browser on a device, but it is not similar to the desktop web browser in terms of user experience. It would be nice to have a mobile application to access the platform."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 54 reviews. Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightIDR.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.