Compare Microsoft Authenticator vs. OneSpan DIGIPASS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Cisco and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It has been stable, and we haven't had any issues since we started to use it."

More Microsoft Authenticator Pros »

"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Pros »

Cons
"Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is not. It should have more integration with third-party platforms and applications."

More Microsoft Authenticator Cons »

"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."

More Microsoft Authenticator Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
29th
Views
137
Comparisons
71
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
10th
Views
895
Comparisons
770
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
380
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
PhoneFactorVASCO DIGIPASS, DIGIPASS
Learn
Microsoft
OneSpan
Overview

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-on process. It delivers strong authentication via a range of easy verification options - phone call, text message, or mobile app notification and one-time passwords - allowing users to choose the method they prefer. It can be used both on-premises and in the cloud to add security for accessing Microsoft online services, Azure Active Directory-connected SaaS applications, line of business applications and remote access applications.

DIGIPASS authenticators are the most effective first-line-of-defense and have a proven record of stopping hacking attacks.
Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Authenticator
Learn more about OneSpan DIGIPASS
Sample Customers
Insight Enterprises, South Wales Police, Gwent Police, and Dyfed-Powys, Integrit, Turkiye Finans, Winnebago Industries, Globosat Programadora LtdaAGBank, Odeabank, Bradesco, Briggs and Morgan, Caixa Galicia, Chicago Clearing House Association, Diamond Bank Plc, DnB NOR, Document Centric Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Cisco and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Authenticator is ranked 29th in Authentication Systems with 1 review while OneSpan DIGIPASS is ranked 10th in Authentication Systems with 1 review. Microsoft Authenticator is rated 9.0, while OneSpan DIGIPASS is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Authenticator writes "Stable, easy to set up, and useful for people who travel a lot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneSpan DIGIPASS writes "Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved". Microsoft Authenticator is most compared with , whereas OneSpan DIGIPASS is most compared with Duo Security, RSA Authentication Manager, Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA SecurID Access.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.