Compare Microsoft Authenticator vs. PingFederate

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Cisco and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication.
Top Answer: Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported. There are challenges when it comes to setting up this solution for external IP usage.
Top Answer: I am a consultant and this is one of the solutions that I implement for my clients. It is used for the federation integration of the whole organization.
Ranking
29th
Views
137
Comparisons
71
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
13th
Views
132
Comparisons
84
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
286
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 44% of the time.
Also Known As
PhoneFactor
Learn
Microsoft
Ping Identity
Video Not Available
Overview

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-on process. It delivers strong authentication via a range of easy verification options - phone call, text message, or mobile app notification and one-time passwords - allowing users to choose the method they prefer. It can be used both on-premises and in the cloud to add security for accessing Microsoft online services, Azure Active Directory-connected SaaS applications, line of business applications and remote access applications.

PingFederate is an enterprise federation server that enables user authentication and single sign-on. It serves as a global authentication authority that allows employees, customers and partners to securely access all the applications they need from any device. PingFederate easily integrates with applications across the enterprise, third-party authentication sources, diverse user directories and existing IAM systems, all while supporting current and past versions of identity standards like OAuth, OpenID Connect, SAML and WS-Federation. And it can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, so you can support today’s needs and future-proof your business for tomorrow’s requirements.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Authenticator
Learn more about PingFederate
Sample Customers
Insight Enterprises, South Wales Police, Gwent Police, and Dyfed-Powys, Integrit, Turkiye Finans, Winnebago Industries, Globosat Programadora Ltda
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Cisco and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Authenticator is ranked 29th in Authentication Systems while PingFederate is ranked 13th in Authentication Systems with 1 review. Microsoft Authenticator is rated 0.0, while PingFederate is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingFederate writes "Multifactor authentication improves security but there are some limitations with integration". Microsoft Authenticator is most compared with , whereas PingFederate is most compared with Red Hat Single Sign On and Auth0.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.