Compare Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ease of setting up a new solution is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up a new solution and to deploy it to production.""The package as a whole is useful for our customers.""Ease of integration into the entire Microsoft environment.""The most valuable feature is the developer portal, which has source code examples in various programming languages to help developers learn the API.""The solution is quite stable. We have no issues with it. there have been no crashes and we haven't experienced bugs or glitches. It's been quite reliable.""Allows the possibility of VPN technology to connect your gateway directly with on-prem services""The most valuable features are the ease of use and it is a platform that has self-enablement for the customers to be able to register themselves.""The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Pros »

"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization.""The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."

More Oracle API Management Pros »

Cons
"The developer console for external users could be improved, especially in the testing site.""I would like to see better scalability and better performance.""Multi-tenant functionalities is missing from the system, especially when it comes to the developer code of features.""This solution is only available as a cloud-based deployment and it would be very helpful to have an on-premises version.""The portal where we publish the APIs could be improved. Maybe this is because we didn't configure it. It is quite easy to bypass API management because we have a lot of information shared on the portal, where we publish our APIs. I worry there is potential for a security breach in the API publishing. There needs to be more security available on terms of the way we publish them.""Could use clearer configuration when it comes to API policies.""The user interface needs improvement.""There is always room for improvement. There should be more analytics abilities so you can know how much traffic there is. Log Analyzer isn't well integrated with this solution."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Cons »

"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated.""From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

More Oracle API Management Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's being paid monthly.""Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources.""Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."

More Oracle API Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges.
Top Answer: We are limited to what choice of solution we can purchase. There are multiple aspects here. If it is a choice that we have to make, then we do it based on the requirement or recommendations, such as… more »
Top Answer: From my understanding, there are some constraints around governance and service-to-service intercommunication managing priorities and our own governance. Examples include, how you manage all your… more »
Top Answer: The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great.
Top Answer: Although it is working great for us at the moment, we don't enjoy its user-interface. The UI is based on old approach and needs an overhaul to modernize the UI and user interaction. Developer… more »
Top Answer: We are using this solution in the enterprise for publishing APIs to external client systems and internal systems to receive and process requests. We are using this solution for monitoring and securing… more »
Ranking
2nd
out of 41 in API Management
Views
23,196
Comparisons
19,027
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
502
Rating
7.6
25th
out of 41 in API Management
Views
632
Comparisons
523
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
527
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
Learn More
Overview
Microsoft Azure API Management ensures an organization's API program reaches its fullest potential. With API management, organizations can publish web services as APIs reliably, securely and at scale. Use API Management to drive API consumption among internal teams, partners, and developers while benefiting from business and operational insights available in the admin portal.

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure API Management
Learn more about Oracle API Management
Sample Customers
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Translation And Localization Position13%
Wellness & Fitness Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company7%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise57%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 2nd in API Management with 18 reviews while Oracle API Management is ranked 25th in API Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.6, while Oracle API Management is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Easy to use API management with a platform that allows customers to register themselves". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle API Management writes "Good security and technical support, but the price could be made more affordable". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Apigee, Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager, Amazon API Gateway, Kong Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas Oracle API Management is most compared with Apigee, Amazon API Gateway and Layer7 API Management. See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.