Microsoft Azure API Management vs webMethods.io API comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure API Management and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. webMethods.io API Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Access control is the most valuable aspect.""The ability to easily connect back to Service Fabric is the most important for us.""I like API Management's ability to do hybrid cloud stuff.""The most valuable features are the API and integrations.""Microsoft Azure API Management is 90 to 99 percent scalable. We have three instances running in parallel.""We're pretty much using all of the monetizations features out of the API manager so we can put up a portal and have a dev portal and then a prod portal and do rate limiting.""Azure API Management is an API gateway that can be used for different purposes, for example, to monetize APIs.""Initial setup was quite easy."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Pros →

"The performance is good.""Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."

More webMethods.io API Pros →

Cons
"The API gateway can be very complex.""The product needs to introduce a developer portal.""From my understanding, there are some constraints around governance and service-to-service intercommunication managing priorities and our own governance.""Price is the first thing that comes to mind. It's quite expensive, which could be a barrier for some users.""It would be better if it were easier to transition to Azure from JIRA. For example, different nomenclature must be performed when you shift to Azure from JIRA. JIRA's storage, tasks, and ethics are treated differently from Azure. Here they might become functions, which is not an option in JIRA because that nomenclature difference is there. If someone has to get into the nomenclature, then there can be different tasks from clients, and here, they may be treated as functions. JIRA has sub-tasks, but sub-tasks don't exist in Azure. The nomenclature and the linking between ethics and a function and a story are different, and people may have to learn to adapt to the new nomenclature.""The documentation could be improved for the customer.""Could use clearer configuration when it comes to API policies.""Microsoft Azure API Management could improve the documentation. The documentation feels like marketing information and not sufficient technical information. Your easiest option is to purchase services from a Microsoft partner and this is their marketing."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Cons →

"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility.""I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."

More webMethods.io API Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The developer and standard pricing tiers of Azure API Management are very competitive compared to other products."
  • "It's being paid monthly."
  • "Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources."
  • "Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."
  • "The licensing fees are expensive."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable compared to others."
  • "Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me."
  • "We pay for a yearly license."
  • More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability… more »
    Top Answer:If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and… more »
    Top Answer:It seems quite good so far. It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow.
    Top Answer:Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems.
    Top Answer:A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility. This becomes evident when dealing with diverse products within a client's portfolio… more »
    Top Answer:The primary use case of the solution is for our digital sale tool.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    38,702
    Comparisons
    31,743
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    446
    Rating
    7.9
    30th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    257
    Comparisons
    288
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    142
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
    webMethods API Management, webMethods API Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Azure API Management is a reliable and scalable way to publish, consume, and manage APIs running on an Microsoft Azure platform. Azure API Management provides all essential tools required for end-to-end management of APIs. It ensures optimal performance of the APIs by tracking and enforcing usage and authentication.

    Microsoft Azure API Management is primarily used to provide a central interface to create, provision, and manage APIs for web and cloud applications and services. Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. With Microsoft Azure API Management, businesses can streamline their work across hybrid and multi cloud environments with a unified place to manage all their APIs.

    Microsoft Azure API Management Features

    Microsoft Azure API Management has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Manage APIs across clouds and on premises: Optimize API traffic flow by deploying API gateways side by side with the APIs hosted in Azure, other clouds, and on premises. Meet security and compliance requirements with a unified management experience and full visibility across all APIs.
    • Customized usage limits: By applying authentication, authorization, and usage limits, you can protect your resources by controlling how data and services are exposed to employees, partners, and customers.
    • API-first approaches: Accelerate your business by building apps faster and delivering immediate value to customers through API-first approaches. This helps you decouple front- and back-end teams through API mocking, API revisions and versioning, and automated API documentation.
    • Customizable developer portal: Improve API discoverability by creating a customizable developer portal for all your APIs. This enables you to simply manage and share APIs with internal teams, external partners, and customers.
    • Facades for back-end services: Transform your existing services and automatically turn legacy web services into modern REST-based APIs using facades.
    • Security for your API’s: Keep all your APIs behind a single static IP or domain, and help protect them with tokens, keys, and IP filtering.

    Microsoft Azure API Management Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Microsoft Azure API Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Monitor the health of APIs, configure throttling, identify errors, and rate limits.
    • Enforce flexible and fine-grained quotas and rate limits. Modify the shape and behavior of your APIs using policies. Improve latency and scale your APIs with response caching.
    • Connect on-premises APIs to cloud services by creating a façade that lets you safely integrate.
    • Create and manage user roles and define end-to-end API usage policies.
    • Consolidate and manage thousands of APIs across multiple platforms in a central interface.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Microsoft Azure API Management stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its DevOps integration, its easy setup, and its dynamic pricing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    Cecil S., a Software Engineer, writes of the solution, “The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is the developer portal because it's very quick and easy to get something published."

    Dmitri E., an Integration Architect at MiBanco, notes, “In particular, in API Management, used as front-end APIs, it's easy to manage. We use Microsoft due to the stability of the company. It is easy to set up. The solution is scalable. It is stable as a product as well.

    If you’re joining the API economy, you need an API management platform that brings it all together for you. API management powered by webMethods is a complete and end-to-end platform, covering design, development, deployment, security, publishing and monitoring of your APIs and services. Use it to unlock the business value of unique data and services, and take advantage of mobile first, open API, hybrid integration, Internet of Things (IoT) and service governance initiatives. Reach new customers and partners, find new sources of revenue and leverage your development community. Now available in the cloud!

    Sample Customers
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
    Clal
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure API Management vs. webMethods.io API
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. webMethods.io API and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 67 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Efficiently manages and monetizes API ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. webMethods.io API report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.