We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Microsoft Azure API Management vs. webMethods.io Integration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, MuleSoft and others in API Management. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The package as a whole is useful for our customers.""Ease of integration into the entire Microsoft environment.""The most valuable feature is the developer portal, which has source code examples in various programming languages to help developers learn the API.""The solution is quite stable. We have no issues with it. there have been no crashes and we haven't experienced bugs or glitches. It's been quite reliable.""Allows the possibility of VPN technology to connect your gateway directly with on-prem services""The most valuable features are the ease of use and it is a platform that has self-enablement for the customers to be able to register themselves.""The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management.""It's very well integrated with the Azure environment."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Pros »

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

More webMethods.io Integration Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see better scalability and better performance.""Multi-tenant functionalities is missing from the system, especially when it comes to the developer code of features.""This solution is only available as a cloud-based deployment and it would be very helpful to have an on-premises version.""The portal where we publish the APIs could be improved. Maybe this is because we didn't configure it. It is quite easy to bypass API management because we have a lot of information shared on the portal, where we publish our APIs. I worry there is potential for a security breach in the API publishing. There needs to be more security available on terms of the way we publish them.""Could use clearer configuration when it comes to API policies.""The user interface needs improvement.""There is always room for improvement. There should be more analytics abilities so you can know how much traffic there is. Log Analyzer isn't well integrated with this solution.""In terms of improvement, it would be helpful if they could develop an on-premises option."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Cons »

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

More webMethods.io Integration Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's being paid monthly.""Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources.""Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions.""The licensing fees are expensive.""The price of the solution is reasonable compared to others."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the… more »
Top Answer: The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges.
Top Answer: We are limited to what choice of solution we can purchase. There are multiple aspects here. If it is a choice that we have to make, then we do it based on the requirement or recommendations, such as… more »
Top Answer:  It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals.
Top Answer: I think rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved. I think they must accommodate the future of the communication between systems and that is related to web services and the like.
Top Answer: We use this enterprise integration application to support web service portals, B2B processes. I'm a consultant and we are customers of webMethods.io.
Ranking
2nd
out of 41 in API Management
Views
24,088
Comparisons
19,886
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
488
Rating
7.6
23rd
out of 41 in API Management
Views
1,002
Comparisons
744
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
269
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
Learn More
Overview
Microsoft Azure API Management ensures an organization's API program reaches its fullest potential. With API management, organizations can publish web services as APIs reliably, securely and at scale. Use API Management to drive API consumption among internal teams, partners, and developers while benefiting from business and operational insights available in the admin portal.

Software AG (Frankfurt MDAX: SOW) offers Freedom as a Service. We reimagine integration, spark business transformation and enable fast innovation on the Internet of Things so you can pioneer differentiating business models. We give you the freedom to connect and integrate any technology—from app to edge. We help you free data from silos so it’s shareable, usable and powerful—enabling you to make the best decisions and unlock entirely new possibilities for growth. Software AG has more than 4,700 employees, is active in 70 countries and had revenues of € 866 million in 2018.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure API Management
Learn more about webMethods.io Integration
Sample Customers
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Translation And Localization Position11%
Wellness & Fitness Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Manufacturing Company6%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise69%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, MuleSoft and others in API Management. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 2nd in API Management with 19 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 23rd in API Management with 1 review. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.6, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Easy to use API management with a platform that allows customers to register themselves". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "User friendly with great internal services; new interfaces easily constructed". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Apigee, Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager, Amazon API Gateway, Kong Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods API Gateway, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, webMethods CloudStreams and Amazon API Gateway.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.