Compare Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Pega, Bizagi and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: May 2021.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's very easy to use. That's one of the advantages for the business, that you don't need to struggle to configure your website and your app service. Microsoft made sure to make it stable and very easy to configure.""The program is stable and we've had no technical issues so far.""The product is scalable.""Overall, all of the features are very good.""Azure data factory is a good tool.""It's a platform as a service, so we don't have to manage the infrastructure to hold the websites.""Debugging using Application Insights is a valuable feature."

More Microsoft Azure App Service Pros »

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pros »

Cons
"Sometimes we face problems, but those are technical problems in Microsoft, bugs or something doesn't work as expected, but that's normal.""I would like to see faster adoption and templates that we can use.""The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them.""I am new to the intervention and I find it difficult to find my way around the user interface. I have my own learning tool. However, it could be simpler for new users.""Lacking somewhat in template data flows.""The solution needs better integration capabilities on the network side.""Initially, there were some rare instances when the server went down because it was deployed on Linux."

More Microsoft Azure App Service Cons »

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Azure doesn't cost as much as other services.""Less than USD $100 per month.""We have no complaints about the pricing."

More Microsoft Azure App Service Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Debugging using Application Insights is a valuable feature.
Top Answer: Initially, there were some rare instances when the server went down because it was deployed on Linux. There are some features that are not available on the Linux-based deployment, yet are available on… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components.
Top Answer: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive.
Top Answer: It's a legal software; we used it for case management. I was developing it. Nobody else was using it.
Ranking
Views
3,808
Comparisons
2,851
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
520
Rating
8.4
Views
2,838
Comparisons
2,299
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
339
Rating
5.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service
Learn More
Overview

Azure App Service Web Apps (or just Web Apps) is a service for hosting web applications, REST APIs, and mobile back ends. You can develop in your favorite language, be it .NET, .NET Core, Java, Ruby, Node.js, PHP, or Python. Applications run and scale with ease on Windows-based environments.

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure App Service
Learn more about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service
Sample Customers
Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount
Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company54%
Comms Service Provider16%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Government4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Pega, Bizagi and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: May 2021.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 11th in Rapid Application Development Software with 7 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "It saves us time and money and installation is really easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "An over-priced, complicated solution that does what it was developed to do". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Adobe ColdFusion, Pega BPM and Appian, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Oracle Java Cloud Service, Studio Creatio, Oracle Developer Cloud Service and Microsoft Azure.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.