We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution's most valuable feature is an HTTP solution and SSL certificate. It is also easy to use."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway gives us a lot of benefits, including domain mapping."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure."
"We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution."
"The tool helps manage microservices by providing developers with a platform to conduct tests and assessments on the web application. The custom domain option is one of the most valuable features I've found. This feature is incredibly helpful for the end-users of the web application. With the custom domain feature, you can change the lengthy link to a shorter, more memorable one. For example, instead of using a lengthy default link, you can customize it to something like imail.com, which is much easier to remember and share."
"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is its ease of use."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"It is a bit tricky to configure. You've got to have a very specific format to configure it. They should make it a little bit easier to configure. Mapping the certificates into it isn't easy, and it could be better. Currently, you've to write a bit of automation to pull certificates directly to HTTPS."
"The monitoring on the solution could be better."
"The support provided for the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement, especially when it comes to the response time from the support team."
"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve by allowing features to use more third-party tools."
"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."
"I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive."
"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 49th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
