Compare Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 11th in Application Delivery Controllers with 1 review while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 18th in Application Delivery Controllers. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 8.0, while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "An excellent gateway solution with good control capabilities and great stability". On the other hand, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with NGINX Web Application Firewall, F5 BIG-IP and Barracuda Web Application Firewall, whereas Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with NGINX Plus, HAProxy and F5 BIG-IP.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, Citrix and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,815
Comparisons
1,646
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
372
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
322
Comparisons
259
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Azure Application Gateway
Learn
Microsoft
Pulse Secure
Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Learn more about Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Sample Customers
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell, AlertBoot, Pernod Ricard, MyBuys, Fusebill, Triboo, Barbri, Cosentry, Gilt Groupe, Maisons du Monde, SUNY – Upstate University Health System, US Markerboard, Colorcon, Juniper Networks
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company34%
Media Company11%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, Citrix and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email