Compare Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 8th in Application Delivery Controllers with 2 reviews while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers with 1 review. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 8.6, while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "Stable and simple to use with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, AWS WAF and F5 Advanced WAF, whereas Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with HAProxy , Kemp LoadMaster and NGINX Plus.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects.We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities.

Read more »

The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes.

Read more »

Cons
The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive.The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems.

Read more »

In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,378
Comparisons
4,787
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
393
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
444
Comparisons
330
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
399
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Azure Application Gateway
Learn
Microsoft
Pulse Secure
Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Learn more about Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Sample Customers
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell, AlertBoot, Pernod Ricard, MyBuys, Fusebill, Triboo, Barbri, Cosentry, Gilt Groupe, Maisons du Monde, SUNY – Upstate University Health System, US Markerboard, Colorcon, Juniper Networks
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company8%
Government6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.