Compare Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. R&S Web Application Firewall

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 11th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 8.6, while R&S Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "Stable and simple to use with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, AWS WAF and F5 Advanced WAF, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Fortinet FortiWeb and PerimeterX Bot Defender.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects.We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities.

Read more »

The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis.

Read more »

Cons
The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive.The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems.

Read more »

The area that should be improved is licensing.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,378
Comparisons
4,787
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
393
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
262
Comparisons
205
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
479
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Azure Application GatewayRohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn
Microsoft
Rohde & Schwarz
Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Learn more about R&S Web Application Firewall
Sample Customers
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell,
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company9%
Government6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.