• Home
  • Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware Fastview [EOL]

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Radware Fastview [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Radware Fastview [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Sooryanarayan Hegde
Easy management and configuration, affordable, and has good features
The tool is beneficial because we don't have to use another product. We are completely on Azure. Wherever possible, we use all native products or... Read more →
Use Radware Fastview [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is not expensive."
  • "Every solution comes with a license and cost. Microsoft provides the license and the total cost is for the maintenance every year."
  • "Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."
  • "There is some additional cost, such as extended support."
  • "The cost is not an issue."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced compared to other solutions."
  • "The pricing is based on how much you use the solution."
  • "The solution is paid monthly. The solution is highly expensive."

    • More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
    Top Answer:We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the… more »
    How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit for… more »
    What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
    Top Answer:I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily.
    Read all 29 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 24 in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    Views
    7,233
    Comparisons
    6,153
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    363
    Rating
    7.3
    Unranked
    In Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway
    Radware Strangeloop Site Optimizer, Strangeloop Site Optimizer
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    Radware
    Overview

    Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    FastView is a web performance optimization (WPO) solution that enables faster websites and web-based applications. It transforms front-end optimization (FEO) from a lengthy and complex process to an automated function. This front end optimization is performed in real time, accelerating web application response time out-of-the-box.
    Sample Customers
    Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell
    Hexatom, SingleHop, Convergys, VimpelCom, BlakcMesh, UnionPay
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 38 reviews while Radware Fastview [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2, while Radware Fastview [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". On the other hand, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware Fastview [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.