We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The production is a valuable feature."
"The solution's most valuable feature is an HTTP solution and SSL certificate. It is also easy to use."
"This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date."
"I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily."
"The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure."
"WAF feature replicates the firewall."
"We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is WAF."
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"It takes a lot of time for a certificate to update in the system. That is a huge drawback, affecting the load-balancing side. And when there are changes to the load balancing, it affects the end-user."
"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."
"I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive."
"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's first deployment is complex. It needs to improve its pricing."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"The support can be improved when you are configuring the system rules. The Disaster Recovery feature can be added in the next release. The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
