We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It is not expensive."
"Every solution comes with a license and cost. Microsoft provides the license and the total cost is for the maintenance every year."
"Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."
Earn 20 points
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 11 reviews while Sucuri is ranked 23rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.0, while Sucuri is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "Needs better security and functionality, and requires more intelligence to make it competitive". On the other hand, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), AWS WAF, Cloudflare and F5 Advanced WAF, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, SiteLock, AWS WAF, Imperva Incapsula and StackPath WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.