Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Block Storage and Microsoft Azure File Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution has a valuable gearing feature.""The setup is straightforward.""This is a very robust and flexible solution.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is the security and the management of user access from on-premise to the cloud.""The major benefit of using Microsoft Azure Block Storage is that it supports various types of data, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, without requiring different tools to read each type. This comprehensive approach simplifies the data handling process for data engineers and allows for seamless data transfer to downstream applications. In essence, this is a data paradigm shift that enables easy ingestion of diverse data types.""Storing and then retrieving data are the most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Block Storage.""We can use Azure Block Storage for some of our bigger files.""The data lake is invaluable. We also use Microsoft SQL in terms of structuring the data and getting into a position where it could be useful to support reporting. We Databricks for data science. We incorporated Databricks with that as well."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pros →

"Very user-friendly and intuitive.""We have not explored the desktop performance analysis of the file storage, but the user interface, API, and the response that we receive over the file storage are very good. We have a lot of customers that connect to the client-side, click the images, and upload them. The beauty of the solution is that we can mount the file storage into a critical server as well as an external drive. The speed that we receive with the images is pretty good.""What I like about Microsoft Azure File Storage is its convenience for customers, cost-effectiveness, and high availability.""The best part is the accessibility to all the files.""The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability.""The immutable storage features are valuable.""The initial setup is fairly easy."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

Cons
"The cache issue needs to be addressed to ensure that the correct file is downloaded, especially when it's done manually into the local storage.""Licensing costs are pretty high.""Microsoft Azure Block Storage's stability needs improvement.""I find the user interface of newer versions, particularly, the flows, not user-friendly. The UI of Azure’s initial version was very comfortable. I didn’t have to remember floor menus. I knew where I had to go to see the logs or grab configuration parameters.""The stability of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is good but could improve.""Customer support could be improved, it can be difficult getting appropriate support.""There have been problems with integration, but it's getting better.""I want to see my region added to the data center. I'm in Africa, and if a data center is specifically added under Central Africa, that will reduce data latency when accessing data."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Cons →

"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that easy to use.""The upload speed has room for improvement.""Importing and exporting data needs to have a bit more documentation.""They should make the solution more user-friendly.""It's a bit complex to set up. Other than that, there is nothing to improve.""Licensing costs are expensive.""Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing.""I have used the file storage explorer in multiple systems, and it seems a bit cumbersome and not very efficient, particularly with authentication. It can be tricky to set it up."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is affordable, and we only pay for what we use."
  • "For the first 50DB, they cost around $50. It's an open solution for everybody. Anybody can go to the Microsoft website and they can get the pricing for it. But the first 50GB of data is a default rate and then it increases for the next 500GB or something like that. It is a pay as you go solution. The more you use, the more you pay. That's normally how you pay for any cloud solutions."
  • "In terms of pricing, Azure is quite cheaper than AWS. However, I have recently read that Oracle Cloud Generation 2 storage is quite cheaper than Azure. I haven't used it yet. We need to look at a customer's requirements, and, based on that, we can suggest the storage. You can save at least 20% with Azure as compared to AWS, which is quite costly."
  • "Azure Block Storage is higher priced than its competitors."
  • "We pay around $300 to $400 a month for some scenarios where consumption is limited. However, going forward, we're seeing the likelihood of the cost coming to around $2,000 as consumption rises."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage could be less expensive."
  • "The cost is very low. The cost is something like $0.01 to $0.50 per gig. It's pay per use. We have a yearly license."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is less expensive than other solutions on the market, such as Cloud Storage from GCP."
  • More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product’s security features are valuable.
    Top Answer:The user interface is very difficult. It is not user-friendly. We need time to understand the product and create a container. It would be nice if the user interface were made simpler. The… more »
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,612
    Comparisons
    1,361
    Reviews
    40
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    14,358
    Comparisons
    11,729
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure Block Storage
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications

    Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
    Sample Customers
    Mazda, BlinkBox, Rakuten Showtime, Xbox One, Serko, ChronoDrive
    Talon, Camden
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Construction Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure Block Storage is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 56 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 40 reviews. Microsoft Azure Block Storage is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Block Storage writes "Straightforward to set up and reliable with good features on offer". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". Microsoft Azure Block Storage is most compared with Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), Rackspace Cloud Block Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Wasabi and Azure NetApp Files, whereas Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.