Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Mirantis Kubernetes Engine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
SenthuranPooranananthan
Use Mirantis Kubernetes Engine?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The costs depend on the resources that you use, and there is a cost-management system to help calculate it."
  • "Microsoft Azure Container Service has costs but in the container environment, there are no costs because it is open source and we are using Docker as the container engine in the master and worker nodes established in the Azure environment."
  • "The solution's pricing is reasonable."
  • More Microsoft Azure Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Containers as a Service (CaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs.
    Top Answer:Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    912
    Comparisons
    327
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    74
    Comparisons
    60
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure Container Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise/UCP) provides enterprises with the easiest and fastest way to deploy cloud native applications at scale in any environment.

    Sample Customers
    Esri, BIO CATCH
    Volkswagen, EMC, Tata Communications, Shenzhen Stock Exchange, Saudi Telecom Company, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, G‑Core Labs, Bailian Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    Media Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure Container Service is ranked 2nd in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 7 reviews while Mirantis Kubernetes Engine is ranked 5th in Containers as a Service (CaaS). Microsoft Azure Container Service is rated 8.2, while Mirantis Kubernetes Engine is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Container Service writes "Reliable, expandable and great for Microsoft-heavy environments". On the other hand, Microsoft Azure Container Service is most compared with Amazon Elastic Container Service, whereas Mirantis Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Platform9 Managed OpenStack, ZeroStack and VMware Aria Automation.

    See our list of best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Containers as a Service (CaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.