Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure.""The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place.""The most significant aspect of Microsoft Azure File Storage is its life cycle functionality, which enables us to transfer files to various storage options, such as hot storage, full storage, and archive. This feature is crucial since we can apply a life cycle method to files that have not been in use for an extended period, and then move them to a cheaper cold storage option to save costs. Since the newest files are stored in the hot storage, it met our specific requirements. Consequently, older files can be transferred to archive and cold storage.""It helps us with geo-redundancy.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability.""It was easy to set up.""I like that Microsoft Azure File Storage works fine and is quick to deploy. It's also easy to connect to it, particularly when connecting it with my on-premise file servers.""It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.""The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality.""The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning.""It's a scalable product.""Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven.""The backup is reliable and intuitive.""Replication and performance tuning are valuable features.""The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Pros →

Cons
"Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering.""It's not very intuitive.""The pricing could be improved. They need to make the costs more transparent so users know what they will be charged and why ahead of time.""Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that scalable. Once you reach the boundaries, you need to migrate to another solution.""The way retention policies are applied could be more optimized.""The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless.""Licensing costs are expensive.""Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment.""Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution.""We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups.""We cannot use the product with other brands.""Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined.""It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed.""The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time.""The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
  • "Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."
  • "The platform is expensive."
  • "The platform is expensive."
  • "The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."
  • More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning.
    Top Answer:The platform is expensive. The pricing depends on the number of CPUs. They have their standard equation method to calculate the cost.
    Top Answer:The solution needs to add an archive function.
    Ranking
    Views
    14,837
    Comparisons
    12,144
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    978
    Comparisons
    838
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    281
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

    Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

    Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

    Sample Customers
    Talon, Camden
    Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Construction Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business78%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 40 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.