We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place."
"The most significant aspect of Microsoft Azure File Storage is its life cycle functionality, which enables us to transfer files to various storage options, such as hot storage, full storage, and archive. This feature is crucial since we can apply a life cycle method to files that have not been in use for an extended period, and then move them to a cheaper cold storage option to save costs. Since the newest files are stored in the hot storage, it met our specific requirements. Consequently, older files can be transferred to archive and cold storage."
"It helps us with geo-redundancy."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability."
"It was easy to set up."
"I like that Microsoft Azure File Storage works fine and is quick to deploy. It's also easy to connect to it, particularly when connecting it with my on-premise file servers."
"It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"It's a scalable product."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering."
"It's not very intuitive."
"The pricing could be improved. They need to make the costs more transparent so users know what they will be charged and why ahead of time."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that scalable. Once you reach the boundaries, you need to migrate to another solution."
"The way retention policies are applied could be more optimized."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
"Licensing costs are expensive."
"Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 40 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.