Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
14,358 views|11,729 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Wasabi Technologies Logo
4,073 views|2,686 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"First of all, the solution is very secure. Secondly, the solution is very fast. It is reliable and available all the time.""The initial setup is fairly easy.""The biggest advantage of Azure File Storage vis-à-vis other public cloud storage providers, and why we recommend Azure first and foremost, is that many of our customers have partnerships with Microsoft and so they have access to better cloud economics. Compared to AWS, we have found that (from a customer perspective) Azure is much more competitive.""What I like about Microsoft Azure File Storage is its convenience for customers, cost-effectiveness, and high availability.""It's a scalable solution.""The most significant aspect of Microsoft Azure File Storage is its life cycle functionality, which enables us to transfer files to various storage options, such as hot storage, full storage, and archive. This feature is crucial since we can apply a life cycle method to files that have not been in use for an extended period, and then move them to a cheaper cold storage option to save costs. Since the newest files are stored in the hot storage, it met our specific requirements. Consequently, older files can be transferred to archive and cold storage.""It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.""Azure File Storage gives good value for money, so I don't find it expensive."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

"The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost.""Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution.""The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups.""The tool is very user-friendly.""We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them.""Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

More Wasabi Pros →

Cons
"The product’s pricing could be better.""It’s a challenge to find the right support person.""Azure File Storage's stability is okay, but sometimes we have trouble with the link to the Azure VPN disconnecting.""Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing.""Microsoft Azure File Storage needs more integrations. In the future, I also want to see GRC added to the portal. If you enroll or sign up for Azure services, your country may not have GRC available in the portal, so you may have to choose a strange country, for example, Kenya, to activate credit.""The product must provide better security functions.""I have used the file storage explorer in multiple systems, and it seems a bit cumbersome and not very efficient, particularly with authentication. It can be tricky to set it up.""The pricing and technical support could be better."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

"The scalability could improve.""The scalability could be improved.""Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent.""I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve.""The solution’s user reporting could be improved.""Setting up users on the appliance should be improved.""The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

More Wasabi Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."
  • "Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."
  • "The price of the solution is inexpensive."
  • "Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."
  • "Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."
  • "The tool’s price is very reasonable."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • More Wasabi Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:The tool is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price is… more »
    Top Answer:The solution must allow the extension of the retention period. Depending on the use case, the retention period can hamper us. We understand the importance of the retention period when we compare it to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    14,358
    Comparisons
    11,729
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    4,073
    Comparisons
    2,686
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

    Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

    Sample Customers
    Talon, Camden
    FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Construction Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government8%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business88%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 40 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Amazon S3, Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.