We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"It's very easy to use, and it's blazing fast. The best thing about Logic Apps is actually its ability to create a solution in a matter of hours. It doesn't need any kind of provisioning, and you don't need any kind of hardware. You can create very small elements like these Logic Apps, and you can build a whole solution from those very simple and small elements. I also like that they are completely incorporated with your existing active directory. You can use user groups directly from the active directory inside Azure and access it from the Logic Apps. You don't need to do anything special, and you just have access. You can just check if the user is, for example, allowed to do some action. Normally it would take you some additional steps and some additional calls to check it. You have to come back to the active directory to make this possible. In Logic Apps, you just have it, and you can use it. I think that there's this concept of logging and recall to the Logic App. It shows you every single step, every single product, and the result it's returning to the next step. It also has an amazing debugging feature. You can rerun some calls and see if, after a correction of the Logic App, for example, you get the correct results. So, it's almost like it's alive. It's like you make a change, poof it, and it's in production, and it's working. The speed of the composition of the problem and creating a real solution for it is extremely fast with this solution. It's extremely fast in creation.""I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code.""The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros »

"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs.""It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes.""The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization.""I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration.""We are very satisfied with the DevOps support.""This is the easiest and best tool available.""Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration.""This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Pros »

"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services.""The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services.""The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons »

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations.""The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet.""It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur.""An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services.""Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings.""The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades.""The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing.""Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost of the solution could be cheaper.""It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use.""If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The product comes complete at one set price including support.""Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services.
Top Answer: The licensing structure is not complex. The cost of the solution could be cheaper. For example, if you're doing a cost savings of $30,000 per year, but you are implementing a service, which is going… more »
Top Answer: The solution is not user friendly. In the beginning, the solution is easy to use and works fine but when you are doing more advanced tasks it then becomes more difficult.
Top Answer: I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money… more »
Top Answer: We are very satisfied with the DevOps support.
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Also Known As
Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
Data Integrator
Learn More

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

With connectivity, composability, and control, Anypoint Platform solves the most challenging connectivity problems across SOA, SaaS, and APIs. It's a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.

Learn more about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Learn more about Mule Anypoint Platform
Sample Customers
nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Top Industries
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider16%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise47%
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 8th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 12 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 7.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "A fast and user-friendly cloud-based platform that's able to create a solution in a matter of hours". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Constantly improving to help connect applications, data, and devices". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, webMethods.io Integration and Workato, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with TIBCO BusinessWorks, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Mule ESB and webMethods Integration Server. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.