We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Standard documents are fine, but in certain situations, when facing specific errors or issues, partners or consumers expect customized solutions rather than just links to existing documents."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 26 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Provides Integration Service Environment (ISE) for content-based routing, data transformation, and enrichment, enhancing integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
