Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The index search and block storage are valuable features.""Object Storage's best features are the soft delete option and the retention period.""I appreciate the scalability of this solution; it is fully scalable and excellent for certain tasks.""We have had a good experience with customer service and support.""The most valuable feature is the API because it is very flexible.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage is flexible and has all the features we need.""This product is very reliable and all of the security that our client requires is available.""The file retention and object retention have been most valuable."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pros →

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"The solution's stability should be improved.""The tool should be a little bit cheaper.""We've seen some performance issues with Azure Table storage. It's quite slow. The performance surrounding it should be improved to speed things up a bit.""They could provide multiple tools to provide you with cost calculations, giving you a better picture or providing better details of the cost calculations over the years.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days.""The stability could be improved.""Technical support should be faster at resolving issues for tickets that we create.""The initial setup is not easy to understand."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Cons →

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."
  • "For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
  • "The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
  • "Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed."
  • "We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support."
  • "The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."
  • "It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use."
  • More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a yearly subscription for the product."
  • More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our storage capacity is cheap because we have a committed discount.
    Top Answer:Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs to improve stability and cloud user interface.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security.
    Top Answer:We have a yearly subscription for the product.
    Top Answer:Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,127
    Comparisons
    967
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    1,768
    Comparisons
    1,667
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    259
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

    • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
    • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
    • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
    • Power big data analytics
    • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest

    Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

    Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

    Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

    Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

    Sample Customers
    Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
    Brinks
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Logistics Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer10%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 42 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Easy to query, offers great security, and integrates well with other Microsoft applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Wasabi, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Block Storage, Zadara and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store).

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.