We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The index search and block storage are valuable features."
"Object Storage's best features are the soft delete option and the retention period."
"I appreciate the scalability of this solution; it is fully scalable and excellent for certain tasks."
"We have had a good experience with customer service and support."
"The most valuable feature is the API because it is very flexible."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is flexible and has all the features we need."
"This product is very reliable and all of the security that our client requires is available."
"The file retention and object retention have been most valuable."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"The solution's stability should be improved."
"The tool should be a little bit cheaper."
"We've seen some performance issues with Azure Table storage. It's quite slow. The performance surrounding it should be improved to speed things up a bit."
"They could provide multiple tools to provide you with cost calculations, giving you a better picture or providing better details of the cost calculations over the years."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days."
"The stability could be improved."
"Technical support should be faster at resolving issues for tickets that we create."
"The initial setup is not easy to understand."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 42 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Easy to query, offers great security, and integrates well with other Microsoft applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Wasabi, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Block Storage, Zadara and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store).
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.