Compare Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year.""We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support.""For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there.""The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive.""Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The key feature for us is the possibility to have a copy of our data and machines outside of our premises just in case of a disaster.
Top Answer: Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed.
Top Answer: There are a lot of points for improvement at the moment. For example, in the case of this product, we are not able to do a backup of what we call NAS, network-attached storage appliances, directly to… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
884
Comparisons
734
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
459
Rating
7.6
Views
1,416
Comparisons
1,321
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
Learn More
Overview

REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

  • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
  • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
  • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
  • Power big data analytics
  • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Learn more about Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Sample Customers
Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Brinks
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company55%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Educational Organization4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business60%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise20%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 17th in Public Cloud Storage Services. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 7.6, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Great for copying data, extremely stable, and has a relatively easy initial setup". On the other hand, Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Wasabi and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Cloud Storage, Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) and Oracle Cloud Archive Storage.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.