Compare Microsoft Azure vs. SAP Business One on AWS
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. SAP Business One on AWS and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The incorporation of several kinds of storage, such as SSD Premium, enhanced the performance of machines."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable feature is the single sign-on with multifactor authentication."
"We are going to use Microsoft Azure to move some on-premise servers into the cloud so that our data can be held there."
"The data factory feature."
"The time to market is fast compared back to the traditional on-premise hosting. That is one of the better things I can say because there is no need to worry. The Pack services will enable it to start immediately."
"It comes with a lot of ready-made studies that we can connect with other existing Microsoft applications, for example, Office, Outlook, Chatline, and OneDrive. Everything is behind the scenes running with Azure. It's easy to build the connectors."
"The most valuable features are the interface and customizability."
"The production and planning processes of the solution are very good."
"I believe the solution is very stable."
"The most valuable aspect is that it is easy to use the software."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to access it from anywhere."
"Technical support from SAP is great."
Cons
"Virtual networks might be improved by adding more rules for the validation of protocols and peripheral elements in security assurance."
"I would like to see more advanced functionality in terms of information security."
"The subscription licensing is very complex and we would like to have it simplified."
"Microsoft Azure can be pretty advanced and difficult to understand. I would like it to be simplified. The licensing especially needs to be simplified."
"Auto ML could be improved technically."
"There were also a lot of constraints with the serverless parts."
"They are a bit closed on the customization side. If they open the customization then it will be very good."
"Dashboards and reporting could be improved."
"The interface needs to be improved. It needs to be more user-friendly."
"I feel that these vendors must be well trained so that they can deploy this solution."
"Not a ten because it's not software for a structured company or something very big. That is my impression."
"The browser access needs to improve, as everybody in the industry knows how limited it is."
"The look-and-feel of the system is quite outdated as compared to a lot of other products out there."
"The licensing fees are more than $1,000,000 USD annually."
"Reducing the price would be of benefit to our customers."
"The pricing for us is higher because we are using IaaS."
"Pricing of Microsoft Azure services depends on the build of what you prepare to deploy."
"It is important to consider ROI when looking at the cost of a subscription."
"The cost is a little high and can be more competitive."
"Monthly billing convenience reduced cost overheads up to 70 percent."
"The pricing model is subscription-based and it's not an expensive solution."
"The price of the limited version is about 70,000 Pesos ($2,900 USD), and the professional version is about double at 140,000 Pesos ($5,800 USD)."
"Licenses are available on a monthly or yearly basis, and it costs about $1,200 per license, per user."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
479,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The product has been quite stable.
Top Answer: I don't handle the licensing or payments aspect of the solution. I can't speak to the costs involved or what the license looks like. In AWS, our monthly cost was something around $10,000 or something… more »
Top Answer: The solution should emulate what MuleSoft is doing. At the moment MuleSoft has a lot of other features compared to Azure API integration. Just the coverage of the features, for example, could improve… more »
Top Answer: Technical support from SAP is great.
Top Answer: Licenses are available on a monthly or yearly basis, and it costs about $1,200 per license, per user. Given what you're getting from the system, I think it's worth it.
Top Answer: The look-and-feel of the system is quite outdated as compared to a lot of other products out there. They are more user-friendly, I would say. As someone who has not used accounting products before… more »
Views
50,071
Comparisons
39,182
Reviews
76
Average Words per Review
468
Rating
8.3
Views
829
Comparisons
616
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
429
Rating
7.7
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure, MS Azure, MS Azure
Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps.
Windows Azure offers open across multiple frameworks,languages, and tools. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities are, catering for all elements of application development, deployment, and management.
Azure is comprised of several different service modules,including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management.
Small businesses can now access all the benefits of the SAP Business One solution on the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud without needing to make long-term commitments or costly capital expenditures for the required IT infrastructure.
AWS and SAP have worked together to test and certify the SAP Business One solution on the AWS cloud. Both SAP Business One, version for Microsoft SQL Server and SAP Business One, version for SAP HANA have been certified on the AWS cloud platform.
Learn more about Microsoft Azure
Learn more about SAP Business One on AWS
BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Comba Telecom, Exeter Family Friendly, GranBio, Kim Tech Ceong, Wego, Blue Ocean Systems, Whitebox Retail Logistics
Computer Software Company21%
Manufacturing Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government8%
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company28%
Media Company8%
Retailer6%
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise38%
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. SAP Business One on AWS and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 81 reviews while SAP Business One on AWS is ranked 12th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 5 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while SAP Business One on AWS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "This helps us meet multiple requirements other PaaS solutions do not but there is a lot of room for improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Business One on AWS writes "Cost-effective scalability and you can access it from anywhere". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Oracle Cloud Platform, Google Firebase, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, IBM Public Cloud and Alibaba Cloud, whereas SAP Business One on AWS is most compared with Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, Oracle Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and Google Firebase. See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP Business One on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.