We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have found the scalability to be good."
"I think Azure's level of automation to achieve efficiency or agility is valuable. I also like the change capability cadence, the showback capabilities, and understanding what our costs are."
"There are many different components such as SaaS, PaaS, and API so every month they are releasing a few hundred new features."
"We are satisfied with the technical support."
"We find Azure particularly beneficial when working with clients who are heavily invested in Microsoft solutions. It necessitates that we also leverage Azure for our solutions and services."
"The design of Microsoft Azure is for it to be scalable and it is scalable."
"It's a flexible solution."
"I come from the DBA side so for me it's the easy maintenance; backups are very easy as well."
"Fiori is the most valuable feature, as well as the the integration between S/4 and another solution as an extension."
"The processes and the way we take advantage and use assistance are good."
"Ensuring data integrity across finance, supply chain, and other critical areas is paramount for real-time decision-making. Access to accurate and up-to-date information is essential for data protection. While the digital solution primarily serves basic maintenance, the ability to handle these core aspects efficiently is invaluable for your needs."
"The most valuable feature is virtual modeling, which is beneficial because you don't really save the data multiple times the way we did in the past."
"We have a wide range of use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud. These include production planning, materials management, sales management, treasury, finance, appliance maintenance, real estate, and warehouse management."
"The BTP module is important for digital transformations."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"It is a stable and scalable product."
"Scalability is definitely in need of improvement. Azure is a very good solution but it still lacks the performance of other cloud platforms."
"The security feature in the solution is an area that needs to be improved."
"Azure installation is complicated. When we first deployed Azure, it was challenging."
"The price of the Azure license could be cheaper."
"There could be more documentation and video tutorials to incorporate each and every feature. This way one can easily get the knowledge and implement it."
"Microsoft Azure could improve by having the availability be 100%. Which is difficult, but not impossible."
"The process by which our customers can switch from one subscription to another should be simplified."
"They're already doing quite a bit. I'm not unsatisfied with anything that they're doing right now. They can maybe make the transitions a little smoother and improve its pricing. The pricing for the end-user packages is a bit high."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
"They should probably offer more cloud services. Most of the cloud infrastructure providers we have make everything pretty transparent, you know what you're getting, you have all these metrics and measurements and everything in the dashboard. Here you have to go through the contracting negotiations and all those things."
"The only thing that could be improved is the cost."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is scalable from an infrastructure point of view. However, it becomes more complex over time because technology is changing so fast."
"Enterprise Cloud's reporting could be more automated to improve content accountability, especially regarding BI reports."
"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."
"It’s a common challenge with applications like Microsoft and SAP that they tend to rely on engineers rather than human resources personnel for knowledge and implementation."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 40 reviews while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 14 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Heroku, whereas SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Amazon AWS, SAP S4HANA on AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS. See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi, It could be easy as Azure is one of the partners of SAP HEC.
Please contact your SAP HEC technical account manager who can guide you on this.
@Harraj Saraon, did you get your answer?