We compared SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our users' reviews across various parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a quick and smooth setup. The solution is praised for advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive reporting, but users note room for improvement in UI, customization, and customer support. Users find Microsoft Defender's customer service excellent, with positive outcomes from utilizing the software, but suggest enhancements in system performance, UI, and threat detection capabilities. SentinelOne emphasizes protection and ease of use and Microsoft Defender highlights efficient threat prevention and seamless integration with Microsoft products.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, easy deployment, and comprehensive reporting. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers robust security measures, efficient threat detection, seamless integration, a user-friendly interface, and effective management tools.
Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete users find its setup cost to be reasonable, with flexible licensing options for scalability. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers competitive pricing and a straightforward setup process, making licensing hassle-free according to users. SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers higher ROI with comprehensive protection and ease of use, noted for better security measures. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint receives positive feedback but falls short in efficiency.
Room for Improvement: SentinelOne Singularity Complete could be improved with a more intuitive user interface, customizable options, enhanced reporting features, and better customer support. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint needs enhancements in system performance, UI, and threat detection for better scanning and threat removal.
Deployment and customer support: Users praise SentinelOne Singularity Complete for its quick and smooth setup. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has varied implementation times, ranging from three months to a week, highlighting potential extensive time requirements., SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers efficient, responsive, and knowledgeable customer service, providing quick response times and helpful guidance. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also receives high praise for prompt and effective assistance, with knowledgeable and responsive support.
The summary above is based on 534 interviews we conducted recently with SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"This is stable and scalable."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The most important feature is the way it monitors the threats and blocks them. About 10 days ago, we were implementing SOC for a particular client. The SOC was not yet implemented, but they had Microsoft Defender. That organization was hit by some ransomware, but the hacker could not succeed. Because of the EDR, the hacker could not install the hacking tools. They were trying to do that, but Microsoft Defender completely blocked that. The hacker could log into the system, but they could not install anything."
"There are a couple of features, such as isolating the devices or connecting the device and connecting live response."
"The patch management is very easy, as it can be done automatically or added to a schedule."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are the ease of use and it was available within the operating system."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"We are a Microsoft shop, and Defender is a Microsoft solution that provides some security at a reasonable cost."
"The ransomware and malware protection is the most valuable feature."
"Microsoft's technical support is fantastic."
"SentinelOne also provides equal protection across Windows, Linux, and macOS. I have all of them and every flavor of them you could possibly imagine. They've done a great job because I still have a lot of legacy infrastructure to support. It can support legacy environments as well as newer environments, including all the latest OS's... There are cost savings not only on licensing but because I don't have to have different people managing different consoles."
"Another valuable feature is that if a machine is infected, one that may infect other computers within the network, we have the capability of segregating that machine in the network so that it remains connected to the internet but is cut off from the other machines in the network. That helps prevent spreading of the infection. That's a very unique feature, one I have not seen in the last 10 to 15 years from any other antivirus program. That's amazing."
"The most valuble feature of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is the recovery and zero-day detection."
"Sentinel One has improved our organization by protecting the environment we are working in."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the rapid threat detection."
"The deep visibility and the ability to perform security investigations and assess our endpoint security posture are the most valuable features."
"SentinelOne’s Rollback is its best feature."
"The best thing is it has a secure shell command that you can use to get into any endpoint and do some jobs."
"The solution is not stable."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"A challenge is that it is not a multi-tenant solution. Microsoft's tenant is a licensed tenant. I'm an MSSP. So, I have multiple customers. In Microsoft's world, that means that I can't just buy an E5 license and give that out to all my customers. That won't work because all of the customer data resides within a single tenant in Microsoft's world. Other products—such as SentinelOne, Palo Alto Cortex, CrowdStrike, et cetera—are multi-tenant. So, I can have it at the top of the pyramid for my analyst to look into it and see all the customers, but each customer's data is separate. If the customer wants to look at what we see, they would only see their data, whereas in the Microsoft world, if I've got multiple customers connected to the same Microsoft tenant, they would see everybody else's data, which is a privacy problem in Europe. It is not possible to share the data, and it is a breach of privacy."
"I would like to see improvement from a management perspective. We have had to depend on Intune for certain tasks."
"They can improve it on the online protection front since people nowadays are moving online and working from home."
"We'd like the stability to be better."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration."
"Microsoft support could be more knowledgeable."
"Sometimes, there are different skews. In a basic skew, they should have basic log analysis without the need to integrate with any third-party or SIEM solutions, like Sentinel. This would make it so much easier for users who don't have log collection or log analysis."
"The solution could be more friendly for end-users, with different type of scans or scheduled scans for it."
"SentinelOne Singularity Complete should focus on analytical data. Backend aggregation can make things faster in the front end."
"I would like to have the same features such as ransomware that are available on the cloud version of SentinelOne also made available for the on-prem version because a lot of people in our region are not ready for cloud solutions."
"SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved."
"We'd like to have a network map or scan to cover network security."
"The way Singularity Complete handles blocking external mass storage is annoying because it is so difficult to unblock single endpoints."
"SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price."
"SentinelOne is making a lot of moves to acquire various companies, but the roadmap isn't clear, and it is still uncertain how the new acquisitions will integrate. For example, SentinelOne recently acquired a mobile security solution, but there is no real integration between the platforms."
"They need to improve how we install the software."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 182 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 176 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, best Anti-Malware Tools vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
