Compare Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Use Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"The patch management is very easy, as it can be done automatically or added to a schedule.""Provides good vulnerability assessment.""It shows us the risky sign-ins, and if a user's password has been compromised.""What I like most is the protection against phishing emails and anti-spam.""It integrates very well with all Windows workstations or other Microsoft Endpoint products. It also works quite well. So far, I have not had any issue that hasn't been sorted out. It doesn't use too many resources, so you don't have to install different things.""Its simplicity is the most valuable. It also has very good integration. We like it."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pros »

"The interface is quite easy to use.""The most valuable features are that it is easy to connect and global settings are good.""IPS and the user interface are good features.""The most valuable feature is that the same agent can act as the endpoint detection and response agent."

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"I would like to see better integration with their other security products to give better visibility from a higher level.""The GUI is very complex and could be more user friendly.""I am not sure if I will be using this product in the future because of the price.""If they integrate with the EDR then it will benefit this solution.""The scanning is slow when it is working with incoming emails.""Its price could be better.""Its interface can be improved a little bit. We would like to have some sort of centralization. It should have something like a central server that is managing all the other clients. There are solutions from Kaspersky or ESET NOD32 that are really doing this kind of thing currently. We would like to see something similar from Microsoft."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Cons »

"The Symantec portfolio is not big enough to cover the organization in all 360 degrees.""That's why I wouldn't recommend it for other systems. It works only with SAP clients. That's why I'm giving it a six. It would get higher if it worked on all networks without the help of SAP.""The network forensics feature could be improved.""Reporting is a major issue, as it is not user friendly."

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"If you don't purchase the advanced threat protection then there is no additional charge.""Microsoft Defender ATP is expensive.""When compared with other vendors, the pricing is very high.""We sell this product as part of Office 365 and it is not expensive.""It is within the same range as other products. It is not too expensive, and it is also not cheap. Its price can be better, but, well, it is Microsoft.""Currently, for us, Windows Defender is free with the purchase of Windows Server. Pricing is an important point for us when we are looking at the competitors of this solution. If we choose to go with another vendor, we will have to pay some license fees."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We are satisfied with the pricing.""The price is okay, but it really depends on the customer's requirements."

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection
Learn
Cisco
Microsoft
Broadcom
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Microsoft Defender ATP includes a configuration score to help you dynamically assess the security state of your enterprise network, identify unprotected systems, and take recommended actions to improve the overall security of your organization.

Quickly discover and resolve threats with deep endpoint visibility and superior detection analytics, reducing mean time to remediation.
Overcome cyber security skills shortages and streamline SOC operations with extensive automation and built-in integrations for sandboxing, SIEM, and orchestration.
Fortify security teams with the unmatched expertise and global scale of Symantec Managed Endpoint Detection and Response services.
Roll out Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) across Windows, macOS, and Linux devices using Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)-integrated EDR or a dissolvable agent.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Learn more about Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankPetrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Construction Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company23%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company20%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise61%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 7 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is ranked 19th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 4 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 7.6, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Good with vulnerability assessment and integrates well with Office 365 and Azure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response writes "Threat protection that is priced well, easy to deploy, and allows you to use the same agent for detection and response". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, FireEye Endpoint Security, SentinelOne and Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, whereas Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is most compared with Trend Micro XDR, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and FireEye Endpoint Security. See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.