Peter HaiderTeamlead MS Dynamics 365 at Peter Haider Consulting
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."
"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."
"The stability was reliable."
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The customer support is good. The first level of support agent in every case was able to solve the problem very quickly."
"I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional."
"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."
"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."
"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."
"We need to customize more often than we would like."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"The solution is not best suited for larger-scale businesses."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"It would be nice if the integration process was easier."
"There is a lot of improvement needed in the top model, such as better integration with logistics, quality management, and data modeling for all revenue types."
"Some of the control aspects such as auditing can definitely be improved. For example, auditing is not very easy, and the user permissions are complicated."
"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."
"The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
"I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure."
Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.
Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 17th in ERP with 3 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 9th in ERP with 7 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 6.0, while Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "Robust system with a good integration manager but needs better budgeting features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very well integrated but the area of customizations could be improved". Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with SAP Business ByDesign, SAP S4HANA, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Viewpoint ERP and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, IFS Applications, SAP S4HANA and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics NAV report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.