Peter HaiderTeamlead MS Dynamics 365 at Peter Haider Consulting
Anonymous UserSenior Manager Enterprise Integration and Order Management at a comms service provider
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The customer support is good. The first level of support agent in every case was able to solve the problem very quickly."
"EBS has lots of application families and lots of features. It is modular in deployment and flexible enough to let the customer increase the built-in capabilities and enable new applications when needed. These are very important things at hand in case there will be a need to expand the product capabilities and/or implement new projects."
"Great finance modules and customization."
"The order management is excellent."
"The solution has other core processes that can be implemented with customers according to their needs."
"Their great technical support is one of the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is its flexibility."
"As we have been using this for the past nine years we have had the opportunity to explore the product. Really everything has worked well and all the modules are very good."
"It can be an essential solution for those who can not just push to the cloud because they have critical data restrictions."
"We need to customize more often than we would like."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"The solution is not best suited for larger-scale businesses."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"It would be nice if the integration process was easier."
"There is a lot of improvement needed in the top model, such as better integration with logistics, quality management, and data modeling for all revenue types."
"Administration takes some effort. Administrating the technology stack is not so complex but application aware database administration and following the new methodologies like online patching can be a little complex and time consuming. Oracle should ease the administrators jobs and do some innovation on this administration area as well. Oracle Autonomous Database is Oracle's leading technology these days. Using a similar approach, application stack may become a little more self-managing."
"Not user friendly."
"I would say the integration needs improvement. Oracle needs to work on the integration layer to make the solution much more robust and modern."
"It's difficult for some customers to understand in the beginning. A user really has to understand the processes."
"It should be made a little bit more user friendly. When I complete my implementation and hand it over to the clients or the person who will operate it on a day-to-day basis, they find it a little bit difficult because they are not from a highly qualified IT background. I want Oracle to make it a little bit more user friendly."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"Oracle is not keeping up on development of the on-premises version of this product as they are concentrating on cloud solutions."
"If you get away from the financials core of the product, it is not so good at handling peripherals."
"The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
"I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"In order to minimize the implementation and consultancy costs, business lines should have proper definitions. They need to have a proper way of retrieving their data, which should be structured well."
"Both the current projects and future projects should be defined well. Licensing should be done according to current and near future plans."
"USD $100,000 annually."
"Considering the market at the moment, Oracle needs to adjust the pricing of this solution."
"This product is more expensive if you compare it to SAP."
"The pricing of the solution is at about $700-$750 per year."
"Licensing and costing of Oracle EBS is very complex. We recommend to use a system integrator during the negotiation process since Oracle sales representatives sometime do not know the actual minimum requirements and may oversell the necessary licenses through ignorance."
"At our various customers, the software tends to pay for itself in less than two years."
Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 7th in Activity Based Costing Software with 6 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 1st in Activity Based Costing Software with 21 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 7.8, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very well integrated but the area of customizations could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Highly scalable: Supports scale-out architecture". Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, SAP S4HANA, IFS Applications and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with Oracle ERP Cloud, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, PeopleSoft, Oracle HCM Cloud and Oracle Taleo. See our Microsoft Dynamics NAV vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.