Anonymous UserIT at a financial services firm
Anonymous UserHead of Product Operations Planning at a pharma/biotech company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"SAP has provided a much more integrated platform for managing our manufacturing business."
"This is a robust and feature-rich solution."
"The architecture of the solution overall is great. It's great for development, testing, and production. I've worked with solutions where the architecture wasn't as strong and it was a disaster."
"The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product. It provides integration of all operational modules."
"The most valuable features are that it's very customizable and it's flexible."
"It is the best solution in the class of ERP products."
"It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning."
"The system can be integrated with other SAP functionalities - such as finance, production, sales, marketing, HR, et cetera, and can also be customized to become a model that's specifically designed for my business. That's the solution's most valuable aspect."
"We need to customize more often than we would like."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"The solution is not best suited for larger-scale businesses."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"It would be nice if the integration process was easier."
"This solution could be made more user-friendly for development teams."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The system is very big. It is not exactly user-friendly, due to the fact that it's so massive and complex."
"The version that we are using lacks in reporting. The reporting feature needs to be constructed more in this product. There can be better scope for mobility. They could include the technical development of reports instead of depending completely on programming. The programming method needs to be easy."
"SAP ERP needs to be more innovative when it comes to areas like mobility and the internet."
"The product does not update budgeting based on exchange rates which is important for BPM."
"It is very expensive to customize to meet compliance with regulations in some countries."
"The solution is quite expensive. They need to work on the pricing to make it more reasonable."
"The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
"I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"This is a costly product."
"There are licensing costs."
"Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."
"The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive."
"SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud."
"SAP ERP is expensive."
Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 10th in ERP with 5 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 25 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 7.2, while SAP ERP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very well integrated but the area of customizations could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "This is the best solution of this kind but has weakness in budget planning for certain user groups". Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP Business One, SAP S4HANA, IFS Applications, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with Anaplan, IFS Applications, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP Business One and BST Global ERP. See our Microsoft Dynamics NAV vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.