We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."
"It is a very good solution. It has a good interface and is easy to use. On top of that, it is very reliable in terms of distribution as well as getting the report."
"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."
"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's user-friendly."
"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."
"I like the data collection."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."
"I have found the uptime of all of our systems to be most valuable with this solution. This is important because we need to guarantee specific uptime and preventive maintenance. We need to know upfront if there are going to be any issues on the database so we can proactively solve those."
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"Some of the most valuable features are its real-time performance view/dashboard, metric history, real-time monitoring and alerts, as well as quick access to Oracle's tuning and diagnostic options."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"One area of improvement is regarding the patching of Office 365 products. We have some difficulties on this side, and it can be improved."
"The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
"Our company would prefer not rebooting computers while people are using them. There seems to be no strategy behind it."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"It needs to be able to load faster during deployment."
"The solution can be improved with the addition of a mobile device manager."
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"The interface could be more friendly for basic users."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 122 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and New Relic. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
