We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for MDM and Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."
"A great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution."
"It supports end-users who tend to lock their devices quite frequently. Its conditional access policy helps us keep the users logged into their devices."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"The most valuable features are the ones that make sure that the deployment is of a standard operating system and the Zero Touch deployment, which is very useful. This allows users to have an out of box experience."
"The ability to manage devices with different sets of policies is most valuable."
"Its direct integration with all the other products that we have from Microsoft is valuable. We're using the E5 license, and we have a whole wealth of different products available. It just makes it easier to have everything from one provider."
"The most valuable feature is probably mobile device management. Small businesses are coming under greater scrutiny and requirements for compliance as time goes on. We don't have to worry about a VPN because we can manage these devices, control company data, and lock users out. If needed, we can remotely wipe devices and deadman-switch them."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"Microsoft Mobility and EMS include Intune for Mobility, which provides mobile device management and mobile application management. With mobile device management, you can control the entire device in an organization."
"You can scale the solution up or down by department."
"The solution offers excellent documentation that is easily available online."
"Integration between our departments has been the most valuable."
"The product is a unified solution and you don't require to purchase tools from different vendors. The system analyzes behavior and activity and takes steps for protection."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product is centralized and we can use it for security purposes."
"Intune should be much more granular in terms of supporting more Android cellular devices."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"I'd like some more reporting so that I don't have to delve into PowerShell and I can pull more of the local device information such as memory, apps installed, etc. It would be nice to be able to see the apps that are present there but might not be managed. For example, if they installed 7Zip, it could report that back via an installed program or feature to see what was currently installed."
"The configuration and pricing can be improved."
"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."
"Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"It would be great if Intune offered better data protection controls for BYOD Windows PCs."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"The auditing and reporting could be updated and upgraded. I would like to see light applications because they consume a lot of the device's memory at present."
"The licensing is quite expensive."
"Microsoft's feature management is based on licenses. Microsoft follows ethical licensing and hence do not restrict the use of it."
"The MDM part of the engine could be better."
"Technical support could be improved. Sometimes they use a third party that's not so knowledgeable in the product and that can slow down things a bit."
"We did the deployment with the help of Microsoft's consultants. But sometimes, we found it difficult to educate the application developers to integrate."
"Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is expensive."
"Its performance needs enhancement."
More Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 5 reviews while Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is ranked 9th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 10 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4, while Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Easy to use and offers good control but needs to have better technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security writes "Seamless integration and easy implementation ". Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Jamf Pro. See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security report.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.