Compare Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security vs. One Identity Manager

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is ranked 11th in Identity Management (IM) with 3 reviews while One Identity Manager is ranked 1st in Identity Management (IM) with 31 reviews. Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is rated 8.4, while One Identity Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security writes "Excellent security and documentation with constant updating to protect from threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "Enables us to find all sorts of questionable activity that we were able to address". Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, CyberArk PAS and One Identity Active Roles.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Integration between our departments has been the most valuable.The solution offers excellent documentation that is easily available online.The solution is very good at securing files. For example, if I forward a secure document, it's blocked from others, as I can send it with restrictions in relation to who can open it.

Read more »

The short version is that we gained significant insight into the issues of access governance. This allowed us to turn an auditing nightmare into praise from our auditors.It gives the best user experience, enabling us an overview of all user entitlements.This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights.The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen.The connection with multiple systems is what makes it flexible. We can create the accounts flexibly, enabling access to other systems. In addition to Active Directory, it can extend to SAP, to Salesforce, to Office 365, etc.Nobody has to put people in AD groups by hand anymore. It goes automatically and that's very good. It's also very flexible. It's quite easy to customize and we have customized it a lot.For me, personally, the automation is the most valuable feature. I don't have to do things manually, like creating user accounts and provisioning them to the target systems.This is almost a complete solution for us.

Read more »

Cons
We did the deployment with the help of Microsoft's consultants. But sometimes, we found it difficult to educate the application developers to integrate.Technical support could be improved. Sometimes they use a third party that's not so knowledgeable in the product and that can slow down things a bit.The MDM part of the engine could be better.

Read more »

The support team could be improved on. The first level of support essentially looks up knowledge base articles and often can't provide the answer needed.The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult.The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long.A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly.More integration with SAP and with the internet of things would be good. We also have system devices that we could manage as identities, so that would be a feature to add.One of the things we would like is the ability to have more than one system role manager. That would be nice. For example, when people are on vacation, sometimes it gets a little hard to administrate system roles.The system role manager, or some of the roles that are inside Identity Manager, are limited to one user. It would be more flexible if these responsibility roles could be attached to many people.It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee.It's costlier that some other products, and there is nothing that fits every solution.We are using a self-built solution. It would cost too much to get that up to the standard of what we need. In the long-term, it is cheaper to buy a solution that has what we need. Though, we are still running the previous solution, as we are still in the implementation phase.It needs flexibility in the licensing or packaging, because you buy the entire package at once, and sometimes the customers are a bit overwhelmed with whatever they get. I would like if they could cut the licensing or packaging into somewhat smaller things.It has helped to reduce customer costs.We are paying for premium support, which is expensive. However, we do receive very good, fast support.It helps us save on licenses for applications because we are following the account lifecycle, as well as account reactivation.We have the premium support and are very satisfied. They are always answer our questions very quickly. For the moment, we are very satisfied, but I think it's because we are paying for the premium support.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
11th
Views
113
Comparisons
78
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
517
Avg. Rating
8.3
1st
Views
7,641
Comparisons
3,829
Reviews
31
Average Words per Review
650
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
Enterprise Mobility + Security E3, Enterprise Mobility + Security E5Quest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity Manager
Learn
Microsoft
One Identity
Overview

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security (EMS) is the only comprehensive solution designed to help manage and protect users, devices, apps, and data in a mobile-first, cloud-first world.

One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security
Learn more about One Identity Manager
Sample Customers
Mars, Whole Foods, Land O'Lakes, DowTexas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm39%
Manufacturing Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.