We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."Live migration, SMB3."
"The solution is easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature is being able to do checkpoints then roll back to the checkpoint because that's what we need to test the software. We're testing the installation and then we roll it back and retest it."
"The simplicity and intuitiveness of the platform. It was a very simple adaptation, if you have any experience in virtualization."
"It allows for quick deployment of servers and workloads."
"The restore function of the virtual server is valuable to me."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to integrate the Hyper-Visor center from one console."
"It's good for what it does. If you have a small or medium-scale acclimatization, it's an excellent solution."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The the only challenge for us was moving existing physical machines to virtual machines."
"In my opinion, it would have been better to truncate the site-to-site replication."
"Failure capabilities are insufficient for disaster recovery."
"The corrupted volume is a problem."
"In my opinion, read the documentation carefully. If you do not, you will have problems."
"An improvement I suggest is having more guest operating systems."
"We've had many issues with Hyper-V's stability, including resource crunches and memory leakage."
"Hyper-V isn't a lightweight solution like VMware. Management could be more straightforward. Even as far as disk management tools are concerned, it would be better if that could be made simpler. The same applies to performance."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Hyper-V is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 134 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Hyper-V is rated 8.0, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Hyper-V writes "It's a low-cost solution that enabled us to shrink everything down into a single server ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Hyper-V is most compared with VMware vSphere, VMware Workstation, Proxmox VE and Oracle VM VirtualBox, whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.