We performed a comparison between Microsoft Identity Manager and Omada Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable product. You will experience some issues with it, but it's a good product."
"Very powerful synchronization tool."
"Microsoft integration products are strong. That is what I like about the product."
"I appreciate how Microsoft keeps adding new features to Microsoft Identity Manager."
"The most valuable and most interesting feature is the conditional access."
"The product’s simplicity and integration are valuable."
"MIM's most valuable feature is its connectivity with Exchange."
"Microsoft Identity Manager's documentation is good, and its end-user portal is user-friendly."
"As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configurable to meet our specific needs."
"The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance."
"User-friendly solution."
"Omada's user interface is elegant and easy to work with. I like Omada's ability to automatically generate accounts for new hires and allow them access to all required systems by established policies. Around 80 percent of workers can start working immediately on their first day without requesting further access."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."
"The administrative features and SoD are valuable."
"Omada offers a technical solution that addresses both our needs."
"Two valuable features of Omada Identity are the ability to discover accounts and link them to identities, and the automatic disabling of inactive accounts or identities."
"In terms of the identity and access management solution for on-premises environment, I think Microsoft needs to eliminate or minimize the number of workloads for the solution to run in on-premises environment."
"MIM's reliability could be improved."
"Some valuable features might go unused because they are not well-documented or connected clearly in user guides."
"The setup was difficult. The deployment process is not quick."
"Instead of using the connectors from the third-party companies, they should make the Microsoft templates available with this product. If Microsoft would increase the number of the box connectors that would be helpful to all the customers who use it daily."
"This product was only launched two or three years ago and it is still in the process of becoming stable."
"The product could be more friendly for non-native English speakers. It would also be better if it were more intuitive and visually attractive."
"The security could be slightly improved."
"When you do a recalculation of an identity, it's hard to understand what was incorrect before you started the recalculation, and which values are actually updated... all you see are all the new fields that are provisioned, instead of seeing only the fields that are changed."
"We are still on Omada on-prem, but I understand that when Omada is in the cloud, you cannot send an attachment via email. We have some emails with attachments for new employees because we have to explain to them how to register and do their multi-factor authentication. All that information is in the attachment. People have to do that before they are in our system. We cannot give them a link to our Intranet and SharePoint because they do not yet have access. They have to register before that, so I need to send the attachments, but this functionality is not there in the cloud."
"The Omada support response time has room for improvement."
"The account management integration isn't bad, but it isn't plug-and-play like Microsoft Azure. You need some deep development knowledge to set up the connectors."
"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."
"The user interface could be improved. The interface between Omada and the user is mainly text-based."
"There's a challenge with handling large amounts of data in this system."
"Omada Identity has a steep learning curve."
Microsoft Identity Manager is ranked 8th in Identity Management (IM) with 18 reviews while Omada Identity is ranked 5th in Identity Management (IM) with 43 reviews. Microsoft Identity Manager is rated 7.8, while Omada Identity is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Identity Manager writes "Constantly evolving while being a crucial feature for today's security needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Omada Identity writes "The solution has sped up employee onboarding while reducing manual work". Microsoft Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Entra ID, Saviynt, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and CrowdStrike Identity Protection, whereas Omada Identity is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Entra ID, Saviynt, SAP Identity Management and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. See our Microsoft Identity Manager vs. Omada Identity report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
