Compare Microsoft Identity Manager vs. Omada Identity

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Omada Identity? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Identity Manager vs. Omada Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Microsoft integration products are strong. That is what I like about the product.""The features that we find most valuable are security, mobility, and Single Sign-On.""The most valuable feature is that it provides protection for our company documents.""The feature that I find most valuable is the security layer of the identity and access management solution. The ability to secure on-premises and cloud-based workloads and to provide seamless authentication into hybrid workloads, which is also both on-premises and in cloud environments.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the fact that I can use it to track who is sending which email, who is accessing which documents or which files, etc. These tools help me improve security within the enterprise environment.""The most valuable and most interesting feature is the conditional access.""Very powerful synchronization tool."

More Microsoft Identity Manager Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."

More Omada Identity Pros »

Cons
"Instead of using the connectors from the third-party companies, they should make the Microsoft templates available with this product. If Microsoft would increase the number of the box connectors that would be helpful to all the customers who use it daily.""They have to improve the User Entity and Behavioral Analysis.""This product was only launched two or three years ago and it is still in the process of becoming stable.""In terms of the identity and access management solution for on-premises environment, I think Microsoft needs to eliminate or minimize the number of workloads for the solution to run in on-premises environment.""The information that is available for the Active Directory portal is segregated here and there.""All actions require logging in to the server."

More Microsoft Identity Manager Cons »

"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version."

More Omada Identity Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Microsoft Identity Manager comes with the premium or community license. If the customer doesn't have a premium license, the reseller who sells the licenses of Microsoft to the enterprise can extend the license for the client."

More Microsoft Identity Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable and most interesting feature is the conditional access.
Top Answer: The information that is available for the Active Directory portal is segregated here and there. It's not in one single location where you can see, for example, all of the security features and maybe… more »
Top Answer: The primary use case is for the single migration of the user from on-premises to Azure Active Directory in the cloud. It is also used for the Microsoft authentication application for mobile devices… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.
Top Answer: Licenses are only for installations and support problems. They are definitely additional costs.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, there are not so many out of the box connectors available in the current version. So what they have improved in the latest version is more out of the box connectors for… more »
Ranking
3rd
Views
2,699
Comparisons
1,521
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
633
Avg. Rating
8.0
10th
Views
1,376
Comparisons
770
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
502
Avg. Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
MIM, Forefront Identity Manager, FIMOmada Identity Suite
Learn
Microsoft
Omada
Overview

Microsoft Identity Manager (MIM) builds on the identity and access management capabilities of Forefront Identity Manager. MIM helps you manage the users, credentials, policies, and access within your organization. Additionally, MIM adds a hybrid experience, privileged access management capabilities, and support for new platforms.

Omada Identity Suite Core identity management and access governance functionality in one integrated solution. High-Level Identity Management and Access Governance Functionality Omada's Identity Suite delivers a fully featured process framework for core identity management and access governance functionalities, that improves IT security, ensures compliance control, and enables business efficiency.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Identity Manager
Learn more about Omada Identity
Sample Customers
Dow Chemical Company (Dow), Whole Foods MarketECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, Krka, Bayer, NuStar Energy, DuPont
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Government15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Identity Manager vs. Omada Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Microsoft Identity Manager is ranked 3rd in Identity Management (IM) with 7 reviews while Omada Identity is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. Microsoft Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while Omada Identity is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Identity Manager writes "Secure on-premise and cloud-based workloads provide seamless authentication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Omada Identity writes "Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology but there have been performance issues". Microsoft Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, SAP Identity Management, NetIQ Identity Manager and Saviynt, whereas Omada Identity is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, Saviynt, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and SAP Identity Management. See our Microsoft Identity Manager vs. Omada Identity report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.