Microsoft Identity Manager vs. One Identity Manager

As of May 2019, Microsoft Identity Manager is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 4 reviews vs One Identity Manager which is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 31 reviews. The top reviewer of Microsoft Identity Manager writes "Secure on-premise and cloud-based workloads provide seamless authentication". The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "Automation simplifies multiple-account and role management". Microsoft Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, NetIQ Identity Manager and SAP Identity Management. One Identity Manager is most compared with CyberArk PAS, SailPoint IdentityIQ and One Identity Active Roles.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, CA Technologies and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: May 2019.
341,120 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The feature that I find most valuable is the security layer of the identity and access management solution. The ability to secure on-premises and cloud-based workloads and to provide seamless authentication into hybrid workloads, which is also both on-premises and in cloud environments.The most valuable feature is that it provides protection for our company documents.The features that we find most valuable are security, mobility, and Single Sign-On.Microsoft integration products are strong. That is what I like about the product.

Read more »

The connection with multiple systems is what makes it flexible. We can create the accounts flexibly, enabling access to other systems. In addition to Active Directory, it can extend to SAP, to Salesforce, to Office 365, etc.Nobody has to put people in AD groups by hand anymore. It goes automatically and that's very good. It's also very flexible. It's quite easy to customize and we have customized it a lot.The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen.For me, personally, the automation is the most valuable feature. I don't have to do things manually, like creating user accounts and provisioning them to the target systems.This is almost a complete solution for us.The business role management feature is pretty good because we have a lot of dynamic roles, and you can configure it with the filters.The solution does lots of things that we did manually before.It is a flexible because it is customizable. It allows you to build anything on top of it.

Read more »

Cons
In terms of the identity and access management solution for on-premises environment, I think Microsoft needs to eliminate or minimize the number of workloads for the solution to run in on-premises environment.This product was only launched two or three years ago and it is still in the process of becoming stable.They have to improve the User Entity and Behavioral Analysis.Instead of using the connectors from the third-party companies, they should make the Microsoft templates available with this product. If Microsoft would increase the number of the box connectors that would be helpful to all the customers who use it daily.

Read more »

More integration with SAP and with the internet of things would be good. We also have system devices that we could manage as identities, so that would be a feature to add.One of the things we would like is the ability to have more than one system role manager. That would be nice. For example, when people are on vacation, sometimes it gets a little hard to administrate system roles.A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly.The system role manager, or some of the roles that are inside Identity Manager, are limited to one user. It would be more flexible if these responsibility roles could be attached to many people.It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal.Make the logging and debugging easier to find, because I'm always confused, "Where do I have to go to turn this log on if I want to see it?"The web portal can be a bit muggy at times. This is one of the key complaints from our customers.We are trying to get rid stability issues from the legacy version. We are now implementing version 8.2, which is so much better than version 6.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Microsoft Identity Manager comes with the premium or community license. If the customer doesn't have a premium license, the reseller who sells the licenses of Microsoft to the enterprise can extend the license for the client.

Read more »

There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee.It's costlier that some other products, and there is nothing that fits every solution.We are using a self-built solution. It would cost too much to get that up to the standard of what we need. In the long-term, it is cheaper to buy a solution that has what we need. Though, we are still running the previous solution, as we are still in the implementation phase.It needs flexibility in the licensing or packaging, because you buy the entire package at once, and sometimes the customers are a bit overwhelmed with whatever they get. I would like if they could cut the licensing or packaging into somewhat smaller things.It has helped to reduce customer costs.We are paying for premium support, which is expensive. However, we do receive very good, fast support.It helps us save on licenses for applications because we are following the account lifecycle, as well as account reactivation.We have the premium support and are very satisfied. They are always answer our questions very quickly. For the moment, we are very satisfied, but I think it's because we are paying for the premium support.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
341,120 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
Views
148
Comparisons
103
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
865
Avg. Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
11,034
Comparisons
4,260
Reviews
30
Average Words per Review
560
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
MIM, Forefront Identity Manager, FIMQuest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity Manager
Learn
Microsoft
One Identity
Overview

Microsoft Identity Manager (MIM) builds on the identity and access management capabilities of Forefront Identity Manager. MIM helps you manage the users, credentials, policies, and access within your organization. Additionally, MIM adds a hybrid experience, privileged access management capabilities, and support for new platforms.

One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Identity Manager
Learn more about One Identity Manager
Sample Customers
Dow Chemical Company (Dow), Whole Foods MarketTexas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm40%
Manufacturing Company15%
Healthcare Company10%
University10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
University19%
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Healthcare Company13%
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, CA Technologies and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: May 2019.
341,120 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email