Compare Microsoft Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want.""It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly.""When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the fact that I can use it to track who is sending which email, who is accessing which documents or which files, etc. These tools help me improve security within the enterprise environment.""The most valuable and most interesting feature is the conditional access.""Very powerful synchronization tool.""It is a stable product. You will experience some issues with it, but it's a good product."

More Microsoft Identity Manager Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.""The governance aspect in general is great."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pros »

Cons
"When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides.""Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues.""I would like to search on date fields, which is not possible now."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"The information that is available for the Active Directory portal is segregated here and there.""All actions require logging in to the server.""The product could be more friendly for non-native English speakers. It would also be better if it were more intuitive and visually attractive."

More Microsoft Identity Manager Cons »

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved.""the user interface could be slightly improved."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high.""It is licensed per managed user per year.""There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend… more »
Top Answer: Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is… more »
Top Answer: Very powerful synchronization tool.
Top Answer: We always need to log into the servers to do anything which means that the product is not very user friendly because we… more »
Top Answer: We use the synchronization service the company provides for data synchronization. We're customers of Microsoft and I'm… more »
Top Answer: This solution lacks a closed-loop, which causes issues. If on one day (by a single user) multiple requests as submitted… more »
Top Answer: We use this solution to automate lifecycle governance and for role-based access control administration. Within our… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Omada Identity Suite
MIM, Forefront Identity Manager, FIM, MS Identity Manager, MS Identity Manager, MS Identity Manager
SecurID
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

Microsoft Identity Manager (MIM) builds on the identity and access management capabilities of Forefront Identity Manager. MIM helps you manage the users, credentials, policies, and access within your organization. Additionally, MIM adds a hybrid experience, privileged access management capabilities, and support for new platforms.

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about Microsoft Identity Manager
Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
Dow Chemical Company (Dow), Whole Foods Market
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business44%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Identity Manager is ranked 8th in Identity Management (IM) with 4 reviews while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 12th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. Microsoft Identity Manager is rated 7.6, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Identity Manager writes "A solution with good tracking functionality and security in an enterprise-level environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". Microsoft Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, SAP Identity Management, NetIQ Identity Manager, One Identity Manager and EVOLVEUM midPoint, whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), One Identity Manager and Oracle Identity Governance. See our Microsoft Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.