We performed a comparison between Microsoft MDS and SAP Master Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the administration console."
"The best thing about it is that it comes with the Microsoft package."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"It has a very good feature called Excel plug-in. You just have to install the plug-in, and then it directly connects to the MDS instance where you can maintain and manage your data and publish it right through Excel. You don't need to go to the front end to make any changes. It has easy integration with SQL Server, and you can use SSIS to do the ETLs. It is a part of the Microsoft stack. It works with most of the Microsoft stuff."
"The solution is easy to install."
"The tool is easy to use."
"Technical support is very good."
"It is very easy to deploy and provision a machine."
"The solution is great at standardizing all of our records."
"Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions."
"I am satisfied with the solution's customer service."
"The most valuable thing is what it does: data management."
"A good solution for large enterprises."
"The ability to identify and manage duplicate data is valuable. The solution automatically checks for duplication possibilities based on criteria like name matching."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of SAP Master Data Governance is very easy."
"SAP Master Data Governance is a customizable solution and is flexible."
"Microsoft MDS isn't getting strong support because Microsoft is focusing more on cloud solutions."
"It would be a better option to have an on-cloud version."
"Stability can be fragile at times. If you are not attentive or make a mistake, it can cause problems."
"I do not like using Silverlight and Internet Explorer. The new 2019 version gets rid of that, which is one of the reasons why we are looking to switch."
"The Microsoft license cost could be lower."
"JMD repositories have records that come in thousands and millions, which takes a long time to process."
"There are occasions when the solution maintains SD and we get duplications of MDS."
"In the next version, I would like to see integration with Azure."
"The implementation could be easier."
"The user experience can be improved."
"It does not ensure data matches after system upgrades."
"Lacks some features that are available in other solutions."
"The price can be improved."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it."
"The multidomain MDM feature is based on EIP systems, which may not be a good model for all master data."
Microsoft MDS is ranked 2nd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 18 reviews while SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 22 reviews. Microsoft MDS is rated 7.6, while SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft MDS writes "Useful Excel plug-in, good scalability, and good integration with SQL Server and other Microsoft products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". Microsoft MDS is most compared with Informatica MDM, Profisee, TIBCO EBX, Reltio Cloud and Semarchy xDM, whereas SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, TIBCO EBX, Reltio Cloud, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Semarchy xDM. See our Microsoft MDS vs. SAP Master Data Governance report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.